Table 1.
Trap size, pL | Percent QS+, % | ||
Biomass | Aggregate | Planktonic | |
2 | ND | ND | ND |
5 | 19.2 ± 7.3* | 19.3 ± 7.6* | 22.2 ± 10.4 |
10 | 41.4 ± 8.6† | 39.2 ± 8.2† | 51.7 ± 12.6† |
20 | 45.25 ± 11.2 | 44.8 ± 11.1 | 45.7 ± 10.3 |
QS+ responder total biomass, aggregate biomass and planktonic biomass surrounding traps of increasing size. QS+ response was calculated as the total volume of GFP+ voxels/total number of mCherry voxels. Data are presented as the mean value of six replicates ± SEM. Analysis by ANOVA following arcsine transformation revealed a significant difference between all datasets for total biomass [F(3, 20) = 14.37 (P ≤ 0.0005)], aggregate biomass [F(3, 20) = 14.18 (P ≤ 0.0005)], and planktonic biomass [F(3, 20) = 9.83 (P ≤ 0.005)].
A statistically significant increase in QS+ response between 5 and 20 pL traps for total biomass (P = 0.044) and aggregate biomass (P = 0.044).
A statistically significant increase in QS+ response between 10- and 5-pL traps for total biomass, aggregate biomass, and planktonic biomass (for all three, P = 0.05).