Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jul 16;66(10):2182–2193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05385.x

Table 3.

Comparison of simulation-based performance (n = 36)

VTV/HFHS assessment categories Sample not meeting VTV expectations, n (%) Sample not meeting HFHS expectations, n (%) Results of method comparison (P-value) Assessment delivery order effect (P-value)
Overall assessment rating 27 (75·0) 32 (88·9) 0·277 0·731
Recognizes clinical problem 13 (36·1) 21 (58·3) 0·083 0·051
Reports essential clinical data 25 (69·4) 27 (75·0) 1·000 0·354
Initiates nursing interventions 22 (61·1) 10 (27·8) ≤0·001 0·545
Anticipates medical orders 36 (100·0) 35 (97·2) * *
Provides decision rationale 36 (100·0) 36 (100·0) * *
Prioritizes 1 (2·8) 3 (8·3) * *
*

Unable to calculate due to the lack of variability in the results.

VTV, videotaped vignette; HFHS, high-fidelity human simulation.