Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 15;67(3):199–204. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx007

Table 2.

Quality assessment

Study [ref.] Methodological items
Cohort or case−control study Relevant age group Independent assessment of exposure/outcome Exposure- response or duration COPD diagnosed by a physician, spirometry or cause of death Relevant potential confounders considered
Albin et al. [15] + + + +
Clausen et al. [16] + + + +
Dement et al. [25] + + + +
Dement et al. [22] + + + + + +
Ringen et al. [18] + + + + + +
Robinson et al. [19] + + + + c
Torén and Järvholm [20] + + + + +
De Matteis et al. [24] + + + +
Hnizdo et al. [7] + + a + +
Molgaard et al. [17] + + + +b c
Tüchsen et al. [21] + + + +b c
Mastrangelo et al. [23] + + + + + +

Items are scored as positive (+) or negative (−) according to checklist in Table 1. A positive score denotes less risk of bias.

aIn the study by Hnizdo et al. [7], analyses were made for trend with duration of employment, but the results are not shown separately among construction workers.

bThe studies by Molgaard et al. [17] and by Tüchsen et al. [21] included asthma in the diagnosis of COPD.

cThe studies did not adjust for smoking.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure