Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;108(9):djw046. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw046

Table 2.

SF-6D utility scores for CCSS survivors by number and severity of chronic conditions *

Characteristic No. SF-6D Mean (95% CI) Compared with no conditions

P Met MID criteria?
No conditions 1475 0.809 (0.804 to 0.815) Reference Reference
No. of conditions, grades 1-4
 1 1538 0.795 (0.789 to 0.800) <.001 No
 2 1113 0.772 (0.765 to 0.779) <.001 Yes
 ≥3 2979 0.735 (0.729 to 0.739) <.001 Yes
No. of conditions, grades 3-4 only §
 1 286 0.785 (0.771 to 0.798) <.001 No
 2 518 0.725 (0.713 to 0.736) <.001 Yes
 ≥3 198 0.695 (0.677 to 0.713) <.001 Yes
Maximum severity of condition(s)
 Grade 1 1532 0.777 (0.771 to 0.782) <.001 No
 Grade 2 1623 0.772 (0.766 to 0.778) <.001 Yes
 Grade 3 1604 0.746 (0.739 to 0.752) <.001 Yes
 Grade 4 871 0.727 (0.718 to 0.736) <.001 Yes

*Childhood Cancer Survivor Study reported health conditions were graded by severity based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03) as follows: grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), grade 3 (severe or disabling), and grade 4 (life-threatening) ( 12 ). CCSS = Childhood Cancer Survivor Study; CI = confidence interval; MID = minimally important difference; SF-6D = Short Form-6D.

P values based on Welch’s two-sided t test.

‡Defined as a .03-point difference in SF-6D score compared with survivors with no conditions.

§Individuals may have also reported grade 1 or 2 conditions.

‖For individuals who had more than one condition, severity was based on maximum grade.