Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;32(22):3405–3412. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw505

Table 3.

Performance evaluation of three algorithms using various metrics

iDoComp ERGC NRGC Gain
Dataset A.Size R.Size C.Time D.Time R.Size C.Time D.Time R.Size C.Time D.Time iDoComp ERGC
D1 11,859 241.36 121.99 75.89 816.23 65.52 8.70 137.47 61.64 8.52 43.04% 83.16%
D2 11,874 203.87 115.64 36.73 332.46 44.90 7.24 114.68 58.51 7.79 45.22% 65.51%
D3 11,932 431.69 107.18 28.92 476.73 52.86 7.09 89.50 56.81 8.13 79.27% 81.23%
D4 11,883 106.47 132.95 33.59 475.25 43.42 6.16 111.37 58.34 7.81 −4.60% 76.57%

Note: Best values are shown in bold face. A.Size and R.Size refer to Actual Size in MB and Reduced Size in MB, respectively. C.Time and D.Time refer to the Compression Time and Decompression Time in minutes, respectively