Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 1;14(2):85–92. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3829

Table 4.

Classification performance of dpADC and of ADC

Thresholda False Detections Se Sp PPV Ac
dpADC0.5 1.50 24 [18b+6b] 92.9 79.5 81.4 86.1
dpADC0.6 1.54 25 [19+6] 92.9 78.4 80.6 85.5
dpADC0.2 1.29 26 [14+12] 85.9 84.1 83.9 85.0
dpADC0.3 1.33 26 [14+12] 85.9 84.1 83.9 85.0
dpADC0.4 1.44 26 [18+8] 90.6 79.5 81.1 85.0
dpADC0.1 1.35 28 [10+18] 88.2 79.5 80.6 83.8
ADC 1.61 29 [24+5] 94.1 72.7 76.9 83.2
dpADC0.7 1.53 29 [12+17] 85.9 80.7 81.1 83.2
dpADC0 1.13 30 [19+11] 77.6 87.5 85.7 82.7
dpADC0.8 1.40 33 [18+15] 78.8 83.0 81.7 80.9
dpADC0.9 1.42 35 [21+14] 75.3 84.1 82.1 79.8
dpADC1.0 1.47 37 [21+16] 75.3 81.8 80 78.6
a

In 10−3 mm2/s

b

Number of false positives and cNumber of false negatives

ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; dpADC: dual-phase ADC; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; Ac: accuracy