Table II.
Tolypanthus maclurei | Dendrophthoe pentandra | Taxillus caloreas | Phragmanthera rufescens (s.l.)a | Saldanha MT (this study) | Changchang MT | Altmittweida MT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age/epoch | Recent | Recent | Recent | Recent | Early Miocene | Middle Eocene (Lutetian-Bartonian) | Late Oligocene-early Miocene (Chattian-Aquitanian) |
Distribution/locality | East Asia | South, East and Southeast Asia | East Asia | Tropical Africa | Saldanha Bay, South Afruca, core sample #114 755 | Changchang Basin, close to Jiazi Town, Qiongshan County, Hainan, China | Altmittweida, Saxony, Germany |
P/E ratio | oblate | oblate | oblate | oblate | oblate | oblate | oblate |
Outline p.v. | trilobate to straight-triangular | concave-triangular to trilobate | concave-triangular | concave-triangular | concave-triangular to trilobate | concave-triangular to broadly trilobate | convex-triangular |
Outline eq. v. | elliptic | elliptic | elliptic | elliptic | elliptic | emarginate | |
Equatorial apices | obcordate | obcordate | obcordate | T-shaped | obcordate to T-shaped | broadly rounded | broadly obcordate |
P in LM (µm) | 8.3–15.8 | 13.3–15 | 11.7–15 | 15–18.3 | 8.8–12.5 | 4.4–5.5 | |
E in LM (µm) | 25–30 | 21.7–25.8 | 23.3–30 | 26.7–31.7 | 20–25 | 21.1–24.4 | 14.4–17.8 |
Aperture | syn(3)colpate | syn(3)colpate | syn(3)colpate | syn(3)colpate | syn(3)colpate | syn(3)colpate | syn(3)colpate |
Exine thickness in LM (µm) | 0.8–1.3 | 1.1–1.3 | 1.0–1.3 | 1.1–1.4 | 0.8–1.0 | 0.9–1.1 | 0.9–1.1 |
Wall peculiarities | triangular intercolpial thickening of nexine in polar area | sexine partly reduced in polar area, colpi widening to a small field | hexagonal nexine thickening in polar area | triangular intercolpial thickening of nexine in polar area | triangular intercolpial thickening of nexine in polar area | rhombic structures (opercula) covering equatorial apices | intercolpial nexine thickening at pole, sexine partly reduced in polar area |
Sculpture (SEM) | nanoverrucate to granulate | nanoverrucate to granulate | nanoverrucate to granulate | nanoverrucate to granulate | nanoverrucate to granulate | granulate | nano- to microverrucate to granulate |
Type and size of sculpture elements (µm) | verrucae 0.2–0.5 (−0.8) | verrucae 0.2–0.6 | verrucae 0.1–0.5 | verrucae 0.1–0.6 | verrucae 0.2–0.5 | verrucae 0.2–1.3 | |
Margo (SEM) | well developed, psilate or partly granulate, with triangular protrusions in polar area | well developed, psilate or partly granulate to nanoverrucate, with triangular protrusions in polar area | well developed, psilate with few nanoverrucae or granula in polar area | well developed, psilate or partly granulate | well developed, psilate or partly granulate, with triangular protrusions in polar area | well developed, psilate | psilate to microverrucate, granulate |
Colpus membrane (SEM) | nanoverrucate and granulate | nanoverrucate and granulate | nanoverrucate and granulate | nanoverrucate and granulate | nanoverrucate and granulate | granulate | nanoverrucate and granulate |
Note: Distribution of extant taxa from Qui and Gilbert (2003) and Polhill and Wiens (1998). Pollen morphology of extant taxa summarised from Grímsson et al. (2018). Pollen morphology of fossil mophotypes summarised from Grímsson et al. (2017). a Phragmanthera rufescens has been widely applied as an aggregate for tropical African Phragmanthera. According to Polhill and Wiens (1998) P. rufescens is only known from Guinée and the Casamance region of southern Senegal, but the sample figured in Grímsson et al. (2018) is from Cameroon and might therefore represent P. kamerunensis or another Phragmanthera species.