Fig 9. Running time comparison.
Running time comparison of the different methods (ClueNet (its three versions: C-ST, C-D, and C-C), Louvain (L), Infomap (I), Hierarchical Infomap (HI), label propagation (LP), simulated annealing (SA), and Multistep (M)) for the (a) social Enron and (b) biological aging-related dynamic networks. On the y-axis, log base 10 is used. Equivalent results for the other two social networks (hospital and high school), which are similar to the Enron results, are shown in S8 Fig.