. 2018 May 8;13(5):e0196969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196969

Table 2. Comparison of microsatellite-based mean genetic diversity (A_R—allelic richness and H_E—expected heterozygosity) among four host-plant associated Hyalesthes obsoletus metapopulations.

	C. arvensis	U. dioica	C. foetida	V. agnus-castus
Mean H_E	0.777	0.765	0.651^*	0.785
Mean A_R	4.567	4.455	3.449^*	4.523
No of populations	9	20	13	8

* p < 0.05

C. foetida vs C. arvensis H_E: t = 5.885, df = 20, p < 0.05; A_R: t = 7.910, df = 20, p < 0.05

C. foetida vs U. dioica, H_E: t = 5.355, df = 31, p < 0.05; A_R: t = 6.945, df = 31, p < 0.05

C. foetida vs V. agnus-castus, H_E: t = -5.291, df = 19, p < 0.05; A_R: t = - 5.935, df = 19, p < 0.05

Table 2. Comparison of microsatellite-based mean genetic diversity (AR—allelic richness and HE—expected heterozygosity) among four host-plant associated Hyalesthes obsoletus metapopulations.