Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;1(4):362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.12.008

Table 3.

The apparent digestibility of DM and OM in sheep fed different diets.

Item Diets1
CON (n = 10) MLF (n = 5) RES (n = 5)
DM
DMI, g/d 1,512.54 ± 0.06 1,512.51 ± 0.04 1,512.62 ± 0.04
DM in faeces, g/d 591.83 ± 20.28a 608.04 ± 3.04a 529.05 ± 28.68b
Digested DM, g/d 920.70 ± 20.29b 904.46 ± 3.01b 983.57 ± 28.67a
Apparent digestibility,% 60.87 ± 1.34b 59.80 ± 0.20b 65.02 ± 1.90a
OM
OM intake, g/d 1,549.82 ± 0.06 1,549.79 ± 0.05 1,549.91 ± 0.04
OM in faeces, g/d 616.04 ± 8.52a 607.86 ± 4.78a 488.00 ± 26.89b
Digested OM, g/d 933.79 ± 8.52b 941.93 ± 4.75b 1,061.91 ± 26.88a
Apparent digestibility, % 60.25 ± 0.55b 60.78 ± 0.31b 68.51 ± 1.73a

a, b Within a row, means with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05).

1

CON = the basal diet; MLF = the basal diet supplemented with 2 g mulberry leaf flavonoids per day per animal; RES = the basal diet supplemented with 0.25 g resveratrol per day per animal.