Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;2(4):288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2016.10.003

Table 6.

Performance and water to feed intake ratio of broilers fed nutritionally adequate (PC) and downspec (NC) wheat based diets supplemented with increasing levels of phytase (0 to 35 d).

Treatments FI, g BWG, g Corrected FCR WI, g WI:FI
Diets
NC 3,481 2,460b 1.388a 7,580 2.18a
PC 3,548 2,538a 1.367b 7,530 2.12b
SEM 36.69 26.18 0.005 116.1 0.02
Phytase, FTU/kg
0 3,367 2,364 1.397a 7,446 2.21a
500 3,560 2,527 1.383ab 7,700 2.16ab
1,000 3,573 2,555 1.365b 7,543 2.11b
1,500 3,559 2,549 1.364b 7,531 2.12b
SEM 51.89 37.03 0.007 164.2 0.03
Dietary treatments
NC + 0 FTU/kg of phytase 3,061b 2,125b 1.440 7,071b 2.31a
NC + 500 FTU/kg of phytase 3,625a 2,555a 1.419 7,927a 2.19b
NC + 1,000 FTU/kg of phytase 3,674a 2,590a 1.419 7,736a 2.11b
NC + 1,500 FTU/kg of phytase 3,565a 2,569a 1.388 7,585ab 2.13b
PC + 0 FTU/kg of phytase 3,474a 2,460a 1.412 7,400a 2.13b
PC + 500 FTU/kg of phytase 3,494a 2,499a 1.398 7,472ab 2.14b
PC + 1,000 FTU/kg of phytase 3,492a 2,520a 1.386 7,351ab 2.11b
PC + 1,500 FTU/kg of phytase 3,553a 2,529a 1.405 7,477ab 2.10b
SEM 73.38 52.36 0.01 232.2 0.04
P-value
Diets NS <0.05 <0.01 NS <0.05
Phytase <0.05 <0.01 <0.01 NS <0.05
Diet × phytase <0.01 <0.01 NS 0.05 0.057

FI = feed intake; BWG = body weight gain; FCR = feed conversion ratio; WI = water intake.

a,b,c,d Means in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.01).