Table 4.
Treatment | FI, g | BWG, g | FCR, g/g | Liv, % | TA, % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON | 1,011 | 647 | 1.551 | 97.71 | 52.28ab | |
XYL | 1,015 | 653 | 1.543 | 98.57 | 51.49ab | |
PRO | 1,006 | 652 | 1.537 | 98.86 | 52.29ab | |
SD PHY | 1,037 | 665 | 1.560 | 98.86 | 51.32ab | |
XYL + PRO | 1,003 | 655 | 1.526 | 98.00 | 52.27ab | |
XYL + SD PHY | 1,042 | 668 | 1.559 | 98.57 | 52.60a | |
PRO + SD PHY | 1,034 | 671 | 1.527 | 97.43 | 52.32ab | |
ALL | 1,024 | 669 | 1.521 | 97.43 | 50.62b | |
Std dev | 28 | 20 | 0.037 | 1.88 | 1.69 | |
XYL | + | 1,021 | 661 | 1.537 | 98.14 | 51.75 |
− | 1,022 | 659 | 1.544 | 98.22 | 52.05 | |
PRO | + | 1,017 | 662 | 1.528a | 97.93 | 51.88 |
− | 1,026 | 658 | 1.553b | 98.43 | 51.92 | |
SD PHY | + | 1,034a | 668a | 1.542 | 98.07 | 51.72 |
− | 1,009b | 652b | 1.539 | 98.29 | 52.08 | |
P-value | ||||||
XYL | 0.886 | 0.594 | 0.474 | 0.887 | 0.498 | |
PRO | 0.133 | 0.472 | 0.008 | 0.354 | 0.917 | |
SD PHY | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.785 | 0.704 | 0.420 | |
XYL × PRO | 0.364 | 0.708 | 0.791 | 0.510 | 0.222 | |
XYL × SD PHY | 0.805 | 0.708 | 0.743 | 0.904 | 0.833 | |
PRO × SD PHY | 0.895 | 0.979 | 0.281 | 0.143 | 0.328 | |
XYL × PRO × SD PHY | 0.726 | 0.936 | 0.963 | 0.357 | 0.042 |
CON = control; XYL = xylanase; PRO = protease; PHY = phytase; SD PHY = superdosing phytase.
a,b Means within the same column with different superscripts are different (P < 0.05).
Means represent 50 birds per replicate pen and 7 replicates per treatment for FI, BWG, Liv and FCR, and 2 birds per replicate and 7 replicates per treatment for TA.