Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;16:88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0916-9

Table 2.

Model Comparisons between the 7-factor correlated-traits model and alternative models

Model/Indices A
7 Factors
B
2nd Order
C
Multi-Trait
Multi-Methodb
D
Bi-Factorc
E
One Factor
MLR χ2 155.413 255.003 344.343 149.167 345.788
χ2 df 118 132 146 108 121
χ2 p .011 <.001 <.001 .0054 <.001
CFI .997 .991 .986 .997 .984
TLI .995 .986 .979 .994 .972
RMSEA
(90% CI)
.013
(.006 .018)
.022
(.018 .026)
.026
(.023 .030)
.014
(.008 .019)
.031
(.027 .035)
SRMR .024 .032 .025 .022 .028
Akaike (AIC) 147,929.900 148,049.431 147,888.189 147,938.931 148,205.576
Bayesian (BIC) 148,678.395 148,719.725 148,480.121 148,743.285 148,937.314
Model Comparison / B Versus A C Versus A A Versus D E Versus D
∆MLR χ2a / 95.685 179.258 6.882 175.441
∆df / 14 28 10 13
p / <.001 <.001 .737 <.001

aCorrected Values; bOV_WB_PR, CO_WB_PR, PS_WB_PR loading on only their method factor; cOV_WB factor loading on only the general factor