Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;10:61. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0494-z

Table 4.

Results from linear regression mixed effects (LMER) models of crude and adjusted associations between maternal, household, and neighborhood indicators of SES and diet quality index and LINE-1 DNA methylation

Socioeconomic status indicators Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
β (95% CI) p value aβ (95% CI) p value aβ (95% CI) p value
Household income
 1st quartile ($37–$225) 0.05 (−0.59, 0.70) 0.88 0.08 (−0.59, 0.75) 0.82 −0.18 (−0.87, 0.52) 0.62
 2nd quartile ($281–$375) 0.46 (− 0.13, 1.04) 0.12 0.60 (− 0.01, 1.21) 0.05 0.18 (− 0.48, 0.83) 0.60
 3rd quartile ($438–$563) 0.14 (−0.52, 0.80) 0.68 0.20 (−0.46, 0.86) 0.56 −0.07 (− 0.75, 0.60) 0.84
 4th quartile ($583–$1750) Reference Reference Reference
Household poverty income ratio
 1st quartile (0.13–0.65) 0.07 (−0.49, 0.63) 0.80 0.12 (−0.45, 0.69) 0.68 −0.18 (− 0.78, 0.41) 0.54
 2nd quartile (0.71–0.98) 0.08 (− 0.12, 1.01) 0.09 0.53 (− 0.03, 1.08) 0.07 0.15 (− 0.45, 0.75) 0.62
 3rd quartile (1.01–1.21) 0.45 (− 0.42, 0.82) 0.56 0.21 (− 0.43, 0.85) 0.52 − 0.13 (− 0.78, 0.53) 0.71
 4th quartile (1.30–2.40) Reference Reference Reference
Maternal education
 < = 6th grade 0.04 (−0.46, 0.53) 0.89 −0.09 (− 0.65, 0.47) 0.75 − 0.03 (− 0.60, 0.54) 0.92
 7–12th grade 0.39 (− 0.12, 0.90) 0.13 0.33 (− 0.20, 0.86) 0.22 0.35 (− 0.18, 0.89) 0.20
 > =Highschool Reference Reference
% Households below poverty (CT)
 1st quartile (2.8–18.2) Reference Reference Reference
 2nd quartile (19.0–22.3) 0.26 (−0.27, 0.80) 0.34 0.24 (−0.31, 0.78) 0.39 0.31 (−0.26, 0.85) 0.30
 3rd quartile (23.5–27.5) − 0.01 (− 0.49, 0.47) 0.97 −0.11 (− 0.61, 0.39) 0.68 −0.04 (− 0.47, 0.54) 0.89
 4th quartile (27.7–34.2) 1.03 (0.33, 1.73) 0.004 0.78 (0.06, 1.50) 0.03 0.88 (0.14, 1.64) 0.02
Median household income (CT)
 1st quartile ($24,896–$31910) −0.05 (− 0.53, 0.43) 0.84 − 0.03 (− 0.58, 0.53) 0.93 −0.02 (− 0.58, 0.53) 0.94
 2nd quartile ($31,989–$34593) −0.26 (− 0.84, 0.32) 0.39 −0.40 (− 0.93, 0.13) 0.14 −0.48 (−1.01, 0.05) 0.08
 3rd quartile ($34,848–$40856) 0.02 (−0.61, 0.57) 0.94 −0.12 (− 0.66, 0.42) 0.66 − 0.01 (− 0.55, 0.53) 0.98
 4th quartile ($41,354–$77272) Reference Reference Reference
% No highschool education (CT)
 1st quartile (13.7–50.1) Reference Reference Reference
 2nd quartile (51.4–71.4) 0.16 (−0.38, 0.70) 0.55 0.07 (−0.49, 0.63) 0.81 0.08 (−0.48, 0.64) 0.77
 3rd quartile (72.5–75.3) −0.33 (− 0.84, 0.19) 0.21 −0.30 (− 0.84, 0.24) 0.28 −0.33(− 0.87, 0.22) 0.24
 4th Quartile (78.7–87.0) −0.02 (− 0.50, 0.54) 0.94 −0.10 (− 0.66, 0.46) 0.72 0.04 (− 0.53, 0.60) 0.90
Diet quality index 0.020 (−0.008, 0.032) 0.24 0.13 (−0.06, 0.32)d 0.19 0.08 (−0.12, 0.27)d 0.44

aModel 1: random effect for position and individual only

bModel 2: random effect for position and individual, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal age, diet quality during pregnancy, years living in the USA for the mother, and prenatal MBzP exposure

cModel 3: random effect for position and individual, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal age, diet quality during pregnancy, years living in the USA for the mother, prenatal MBzP exposure, and cell estimate proportions

dNeighborhood poverty included as a covariate due to evidence of confounding by neighborhood poverty. Diet quality index was Z standardized so that continuous variables were on similar scales