Table 3.
Model 1f b(SE) | Model 2f,g b(SE) | Model 3f,g b(SE) | Model 4f,g,h b(SE) | Model 5f,g,h b(SE) | Model 6f,g,h b(SE) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Status at age 32 Intercept | 26.417* (0.107) | 26.400* (0.111) | 26.387* (0.109) | 26.745* (0.115) | 26.784* (0.117) | 26.751* (0.117) |
Blacka | 0.534* (0.144) | 0.415* (0.160) | 0.491* (0.165) | 0.541* (0.159) | 0.425* (0.161) | 0.375* (0.169) |
Hispanica | 1.702* (0.200) | 1.354* (0.216) | 1.393* (0.243) | 1.626* (0.202) | 1.593* (0.203) | 1.361* (0.247) |
Mothers’ educationb | −0.099* (0.022) | −0.148* (0.035) | −0.101* (0.036) | |||
Mothers’ education×Black | 0.118* (0.057) | 0.055 (0.058) | ||||
Mothers’ education×Hispanic | 0.054 (0.049) | 0.031 (0.050) | ||||
Respondents’ educationb | −0.102* (0.014) | −0.135* (0.019) | −0.124* (0.020) | |||
Respondents’ education×Black | 0.163* (0.035) | 0.175* (0.036) | ||||
Respondents’ education×Hispanic | −0.021 (0.037) | −0.011 (0.039) | ||||
Rate of changec | ||||||
Age | 0.210* (0.005) | 0.210* (0.005) | 0.210* (0.005) | 0.207* (0.005) | 0.213* (0.005) | 0.213* (0.005) |
Age2 | −0.0047* (0.0003) | −0.0047* (0.0003) | −0.0047* (0.0003) | −0.0041* (0.0003) | −0.0045* (0.0004) | −0.0045* (0.0004) |
Age×Black | 0.052* (0.006) | 0.050* (0.006) | 0.050* (0.007) | 0.054* (0.006) | 0.043* (0.007) | 0.039* (0.007) |
Age2×Black | −0.0016* (0.0005) | −0.0013* (0.0005) | −0.0011* (0.0005) | −0.0015* (0.0005) | −0.0017* (0.0005) | −0.0012* (0.0005) |
Age×Hispanic | 0.037* (0.007) | 0.027* (0.008) | 0.023* (0.010) | 0.037* (0.007) | 0.031* (0.008) | 0.015 (0.010) |
Age2×Hispanic | −0.0030* (0.0005) | −0.0017* (0.0006) | −0.0019* (0.0007) | −0.0025* (0.0005) | −0.0028* (0.0006) | −0.0024* (0.0008) |
Age×Mothers’ education | −0.002* (0.001) | −0.001 (0.002) | 0.001 (0.002) | |||
Age2×Mothers’ education | 0.0003* (0.0001) | 0.0002 (0.0001) | 0.0000 (0.0001) | |||
Age×Mothers’ education×Black | −0.000 (0.003) | −0.005* (0.003) | ||||
Age2×Mothers’ education×Black | 0.0003 (0.0002) | 0.0005* (0.0002) | ||||
Age×Mothers’ education×Hispanic | −0.002 (0.002) | −0.005* (0.002) | ||||
Age2×Mothers’ education×Hispanic | 0.0001 (0.0002) | −0.0001 (0.0002) | ||||
Age×Respondents’ education | −0.003* (0.001) | −0.007* (0.001) | −0.007* (0.001) | |||
Age2×Respondents’ education | 0.0005* (0.0001) | 0.0005* (0.0001) | 0.0005* (0.0001) | |||
Age×Respondents’ education×Black | 0.013* (0.002) | 0.013* (0.002) | ||||
Age2×Respondents’ education×Black | −0.0006* (0.0002) | −0.0007* (0.0002) | ||||
Age×Respondents’ education×Hispanic | 0.006* (0.002) | 0.008* (0.003) | ||||
Age2×respondents’ education×Hispanic | 0.0003 (0.0002) | 0.0003 (0.0002) | ||||
Random effectsd | ||||||
u0i | 3.852 | 3.839 | 3.836 | 3.832 | 3.820 | 3.816 |
u1i | 0.148 | 0.148 | 0.148 | 0.148 | 0.147 | 0.147 |
u2i | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 |
Goodness of fit | ||||||
Δ−2 log likelihoode | −4815.7* | −49.6* | −8.2 | −303.7* | −59.5* | −339.8*, −34.4* |
p<0.05 two-tailed test.
Reference group is White.
Mother’s and respondent’s education are continuous and centered at 12.
Age is centered at 32.
Unconditional model variance estimates: u0i =3.968, u1i=0.273, u2i=0.011.
Change in the −2LL contrasts Model 1 to the unconditional model (not shown); Model 2 to Model 1; and Model 3 to Model 2; Model 4 to Model 1; Model 5 to Model 4; Model 6 to Model 3 (top estimate); and Model 6 to Model 5 (bottom estimate).
Adjusting for nativity of respondent and respondents’ mother and father; birth cohort; birth cohort×age; birth cohort×age-squared; mortality; mortality×age; and mortality×age-squared.
Adjusting for community at age 14, family structure at age 14, and area of residence at age 14.
Adjusting for time-varying measures of occupational status, community, and marital status.