Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;110(4):373–380. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180036

Table 1.

Within-group echocardiographic comparison of mean left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter

GROUP EDD1 EDD2 p ESD1 ESD2 p LVEF1 LVEF2 p
CG 0.26 0.13 0.008* 0.17 0.74 0.120 76.10 71.20 0.112
CTG 0.50 0.58 0.741 0.83 0.19 0.422 73.67 71.89 0.579
ITG 0.19 0.88 0.153 0.78 0.01 0.510 70.70 71.50 0.792

CG: control group, CTG: continuous training group; ITG: interval training group; EDD1: end-diastolic diameter at first evaluation; EDD2: end-diastolic diameter at the second evaluation; ESD1: end-systolic diameter at first evaluation; ESD2: end-systolic diameter at second evaluation; LVEF1: left ventricular ejection fraction at first evaluation; LVEF2: left ventricular ejection fraction at second evaluation; p = p-value of LVEF between the two study days. Student's t-test,

*

p < 0.05.