Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr;110(4):373–380. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180036

Table 2.

Between-group echocardiographic comparisons of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter

Variable Group Mean ± SD p
LVEF1 (%) CG 76.10 ± 6.89 0.368
CTG 73.67 ± 10.01
ITG 70.70 ± 8.15
LVEF 2 (%) CG 71.20 ± 6.44 0.981
CTG 71.89 ± 8.68
ITG 71.50 ± 7.53
EDD 1 (mm) CG 5.26 ± 0.80 0.103
CTG 6.50 ± 1.63
ITG 6.19 ± 1.30
EDD2 (mm) CG 6.20 ± 0.58 0.404
CTG 6.00 ± 1.15
ITG 6.00 ± 1.69
ESD1 (mm) CG 3.17 ± 0.70 0.308
CTG 3.83 ± 0.93
ITG 3.78 ± 1.40
ESD 2 (mm) CG 3.74 ± 0.75 0.709
CTG 4.19 ± 1.23
ITG 4.01 ± 1.46

LVEF1: left ventricular ejection fraction at first evaluation; LVEF2: left ventricular ejection fraction at second evaluation; p: p-value of LVEF between the two study days EDD1: end-diastolic diameter at first evaluation; EDD2: end-diastolic diameter at the second evaluation; ESD1: end-systolic diameter at first evaluation; ESD2: end‑systolic diameter at second evaluation; CG: control group, CTG: continuous training group; ITG: interval training group; One-factor ANOVA