Skip to main content
. 2018 May 7;2(9):1014–1021. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018018317

Table 2.

Genotype distributions of intercrosses between double heterozygous mice and crosses between Mcfd2−/−Lman1+/gt1 and Mcfd2+/−Lman1+/gt1 mice

Crosses Genotype distribution P
Mcfd2+/−Lman1+/gt1 × Mcfd2+/−Lman1+/gt1 M−/−,Lgt1/gt1 M+/−,Lgt1/gt1 M+/+,Lgt1/gt1 M−/−,L+/gt1 M+/−,L+/gt1 M+/+,L+/gt1 M−/−,L+/+ M+/−,L+/+ M+/+,L+/+
 Expected, % 6.25 12.5 6.25 12.5 25 12.5 6.25 12.5 6.25
 Observed on mixed background (n = 184), % (n) 5.43 (10) 10.33 (19) 5.43 (10) 14.13 (26) 27.17 (50) 10.33 (19) 5.43 (10) 15.76 (29) 5.98 (11) 0.67
 Observed on C57BL/6J (n = 343), % (n) 2.62 (9) 8.16 (28) 3.21 (11) 16.91 (58) 26.82 (92) 12.83 (44) 7.00 (24) 16.91 (58) 5.54 (19) 0.028
Mcfd2−/−Lman1+/gt1 × Mcfd2+/−Lman1+/gt1 M−/−,Lgt1/gt1 M+/−,Lgt1/gt1 M−/−,L+/gt1 M+/−,L+/gt1 M−/−,L+/+ M+/−,L+/+
 Expected, % 12.5 12.5 25 25 12.5 12.5
 Observed on C57BL/6J (n = 342), % (n) 5.85 (20) 9.06 (31) 28.65 (98) 22.81 (78) 14.91 (51) 18.71 (64) 0.004

P values were calculated for Mcfd2−/−Lman1gt1/gt1 mice vs all other genotypes using logistic regression.

L, Lman1; M, Mcfd2.