Skip to main content
. 1999 Oct;121(2):579–588. doi: 10.1104/pp.121.2.579

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A, The response of CO2 assimilation rate to intercellular pCO2 for leaves of a control plant (○) and two T0 transformants (▪ and ●). Solid lines are CO2 assimilation rates (A) modeled using the equation (Farquhar et al., 1980):
graphic file with name M1.gif 1
where Vcmax, Kc, and Ko, are the substrate-saturated carboxylase activity and the Michaelis constants for CO2 and O2, respectively. Γ* is the CO2 compensation point in the absence of nonphotorespiratory CO2 release, Rd. C and O are the partial pressures of CO2 and O2. Rubisco kinetic parameters can only be estimated from gas-exchange measurements with plants whose Rubisco activities are low enough to limit photosynthesis under all measurement conditions. The transformants in this study fulfill this criterion and the modeled line is drawn with the following fitted parameters: Vcmax = 37 μmol m−2 s−1, Kc = 318 μbar, Ko = 55.6 mbar, Γ* = 140 μbar, and Rd = 2.5 μmol m−2 s−1. The control plants were not limited by Rubisco activity at the higher CO2 partial pressures. For them, the modeled line is drawn using kinetic parameters determined previously with Rubisco-deficient anti-rbcS tobacco (Vcmax = 90 μmol m−2 s−1, Kc = 404 μbar, Ko = 248 mbar, Γ* = 37 μbar, and Rd = 3 μmol m−2 s−1 [von Caemmerer et al., 1994]). Note that Γ* = 0.5O/Sc/o. We assumed that chloroplastic pCO2 was equal to the intercellular pCO2. B, The CO2 compensation point as a function of pO2 for leaves of the wild type (○ and □) and transformants (▪ and ●). Solid lines are the compensation point modeled using the equation (Farquhar et al., 1980):
graphic file with name M2.gif 2
with the same parameter values as above.