Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Dairy Sci. 2013 Dec 18;97(2):764–778. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6926

Table 3.

Stimulatory response (LSM ± SEM) from experiments 1 and 2 analyzed by 2 methods: experiment 2 only and the first periods from experiments 1 and 21

Item Interactions: Feed × LH content P-value


AL-H AL-L FR-H FR-L Feed LH Feed × LH
Experiment 2 (no.) 16 15 15 16
Follicles >9 mm (no.) 18.8 ± 2.1 16.6 ± 2.1 15.8 ± 2.1 16.6 ± 2.1 0.34 0.68 0.38
Ovulation rate – 60 h (%) 81.4 ± 5.3 77.1 ± 5.5 74.8 ± 5.5 76.9 ± 5.3 0.83 0.74 0.39
CL number (no.) 18.3 ± 2.8 15.5 ± 2.8 17.9 ± 2.8 14.9 ± 2.8 0.78 0.10 0.96
First period (no.) 8 8 8 8
Follicles >9 mm (no.) 22.0A ± 3.6 17.9AB ± 3.6 13.6B ± 3.6 19.1AB ± 3.6 0.33 0.85 0.19
Ovulation rate – 60 h (%) 87.3a ± 6.9 63.5b ± 6.9 85.5a ± 6.9 92.3a ± 6.9 0.06 0.23 0.04
CL number (no.) 22.1 ± 3.9 16.6 ± 3.9 17.0 ± 3.9 19.4 ± 3.9 0.76 0.69 0.32
a,b

Within response variable, means with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05)

A,B

Within response variable, means with different superscripts tended to differ (P < 0.15).

1

Superstimulated, lactating Holstein dairy cows were fed either ad libitum (AL) or feed restricted (FR) and exposed to either low LH (L) or high LH (H) to create 4 treatments: AL-H, AL-L, FR-H, and FR-L.