Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2012 Sep 19;188(5):1739–1745. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.021

Table 2.

ROC analysis for detection of prostate cancer.

Imaging Mode All sextants with cancer tabulated as true positive High grade (Gleason score ≥7) sextant tabulated as true positive High grade (Gleason score ≥7) High volume (>50% core involvement) sextant tabulated as true positive
AZ Std Error AZ 95% CI AZ Std Error AZ 95% CI AZ Std Error AZ 95% CI
Baseline Grayscale 0.62 0.02 0.58–0.65 0.74 0.03 0.68–0.81 0.83 0.04 0.77–0.90
Baseline Color Doppler 0.57 0.02 0.53–0.60 0.68 0.03 0.61–0.74 0.75 0.04 0.67–0.83
Baseline Power Doppler 0.57 0.02 0.53–0.61 0.68 0.03 0.61–0.75 0.76 0.04 0.68–0.83
CE Harmonic Imaging 0.62 0.02 0.58–0.64 0.76 0.03 0.70–0.82 0.84 0.03 0.77–0.90
CE Color Doppler 0.60 0.02 0.56–0.64 0.73 0.03 0.67–0.79 0.79 0.04 0.71–0.86
CE Power Doppler 0.60 0.02 0.55–0.64 0.77 0.03 0.71–0.83 0.83 0.03 0.77–0.90
CE Intermittent Imaging 0.61 0.02 0.57–0.65 0.76 0.03 0.70–0.82 0.84 0.03 0.78–0.89
CE MicroFlow Imaging 0.61 0.02 0.56–0.65 0.76 0.03 0.70–0.82 0.86 0.03 0.80–0.91
Grayscale +
 Baseline Color Doppler 0.62 0.02 0.58–0.66 0.77 0.02 0.71–0.84 0.87 0.03 0.82–0.93
 Baseline Power Doppler 0.62 0.02 0.57–0.66 0.77 0.02 0.71–0.84 0.88 0.03 0.82–0.93
 CE Harmonic Imaging 0.64 0.02 0.60–0.68 0.79 0.02 0.73–0.86 0.88 0.03 0.82–0.94
 CE Color Doppler 0.64 0.02 0.60–0.68 0.78 0.02 0.73–0.84 0.87 0.03 0.81–0.93
 CE Power Doppler 0.62 0.02 0.58–0.67 0.80 0.02 0.75–0.86 0.89 0.02 0.85–0.94
 CE Intermittent Imaging 0.63 0.02 0.59–0.68 0.80 0.02 0.74–0.86 0.89 0.03 0.83–0.94
 CE MicroFlow Imaging 0.63 0.02 0.59–0.68 0.80 0.02 0.74–0.86 0.90 0.03 0.86–0.95
All modes in one model (CE=Contrast Enhanced) 0.64 0.02 0.60–0.69 0.81 0.02 0.76–0.87 0.91 0.02 0.87–0.95