Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 31;21(3):310–322. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0884-4

Table 3.

Overview of the methods, cut-off and statistical reporting for the oral glucose tolerance test (n = 11), ordered by frequency

OGTT analysis Number of studies (%) References
Method
 2 h period: pre-dose, 30, 60, 120 min 1 (9%) [24]
 2 h period: 30, 60, 90, 120 min 1 (9%) [45]
 3 h period: pre-dose, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 min 1 (9%) [33]
 Not reported 8 (73%) [27, 30, 38, 59, 6163, 67]
Glucose administration
 75 g 5 (45%) [24, 27, 33, 45, 59]
 Not defined 6 (55%) [30, 38, 6163, 67]
Nadir cut-off for biochemical control
 < 1 ng/ml 5 (45%) [24, 33, 59, 62, 67]
 < 0.4 ng/ml 1 (9%) [67]
 < 1 µg/dl 1 (9%) [61]
 < 2 mU/L 1 (9%) [27]
 No cut-off reported/used 4 (36%) [30, 38, 45, 63]
Summary statistics
 % Biochemical control 5 (45%) [24, 27, 33, 61, 62, 67]
 Individual levels 3 (27%) [24, 30, 38]
 Mean ± SD 3 (27%) [24, 33, 63]
 Median (IQR) 3 (27%) [24, 45, 59]
 % Nadir change from baseline mean ± SD 1 (9%) [24]
 Mean ± SD [range] 1 (9%) [30]
 Mean ± SD pre-glucose GH 1 (9%) [24]
 Median 1 (9%) [62]
 Median (IQR) pre-glucose GH 1 (9%) [24]
Growth hormone assay reported
 Yes (%) 7 (64%) [30, 33, 45, 59, 61, 63, 67]

SD Standard deviation, IQR interquartile range