Skip to main content
. 2018 May 5;8(5):e018211. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018211

Table 5.

Association between period of residence in prefabricated temporary housing and amelioration of psychological distress among the subjects with higher psychological distress (K6 score ≥5) at the baseline (n=168)

Period of residence in prefabricated temporary housing (years) P trend
<3 years 3–4 years >4 years (still living in prefabricated temporary housing)
Number of subjects 87 58 23
Number of subjects with amelioration* 38 24 3
Crude OR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.89 (0.45 to 1.72) 0.23 (0.06 to 0.70) 0.033
Age–sex adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.87 (0.44 to 1.70) 0.21 (0.05 to 0.66) 0.028
Multivariate adjusted OR (95% CI)† 1.00 (reference) 0.93 (0.46 to 1.88) 0.26 (0.06 to 0.85) 0.082

*Amelioration was defined as the change from higher (K6 score ≥5) (2011) to lower psychological distress (K6 score <5) (2016).

†Adjustment items were age, sex, K6 score at baseline, subjective economic status (poorest, fair to poorer or missing), social ties (strong ties, weak ties or missing) and self-rated health (good health, bad health or missing).

K6, Kessler 6-Item Psychological Distress Scale.