Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 25;18(5):1363–1370. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv263

Table 3.

Multivariable, Multilevel Linear Regression of the Change in the Area-Level Proportion of Moderately or Highly Compliant Points-of-Sale From Wave 1 to Wave 2 (2012 vs. 2013) Overall and Stratified by City Size, Adjusting for City- and Area-Level Random Intercepts

Model 1 overall ( N = 210) Model 2 rural towns ( n = 62) Model 3 small cities a ( n = 50) Model 4 mid-sized cities a ( n = 48) Model 5 large cities a ( n = 50)
β ( SE ) P β ( SE ) P b β ( SE ) P b β ( SE ) P b β ( SE ) P
Wave 2 vs. Wave 1 −0.03 (0.04) .529 −0.16 (0.08) .039 0.25 (0.08) .001 −0.20 (0.08) .018 0.03 (0.07) .679
City size a
 Rural
 Small cities −0.003 (0.07) .968
 Mid-sized cities −0.05 (0.07) .483
 Large cities 0.0001 (0.07) .998
Region
 North
 West −0.05 (0.09) .554 0.27 (0.14) .064 −0.19 (0.14) .157 −0.07 (0.13) .614 −0.15 (0.12) .207
 South −0.08 (0.07) .291 0.31 (0.13) .014 −0.26 (0.12) .029 −0.18 (0.11) .120 −0.19 (0.10) .063
 East −0.02 (0.08) .778 0.44 (0.13) .001 −0.31 (0.14) .025 −0.19 (0.13) .143 −0.15 (0.12) .186

β = beta coefficient; SE = standard error.

a Small cities (fewer than half a million inhabitants), mid-sized cities (half a million to 1.9 million inhabitants), large cities (at least 2 million inhabitants).

b Bold typeface indicates P < .05.