Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 31;11(3):91–104. doi: 10.1177/1753944716652787

Table 1.

Comparison of study designs and key findings of the AVERROES and ARISTOTLE trials [Connolly et al. 2011; and Granger et al. 2011].

Trial AVERROES ARISTOTLE
Design RCT, double blind Noninferiority RCT, double blind, double dummy, placebo controlled.
Patient population Patients ‘unsuitable’ for VKA based on being unacceptable or prior failure Patients with AFib and at least one other stroke risk factor
Treatment versus comparison Apixaban versus aspirin Apixaban versus warfarin
Number of subjects 5599 18,201
Primary outcome: Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.6% per year in the apixaban group and 3.7% per year in the ASA group (p < 0.001) Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.27% per year in the apixaban group, 1.60% per year in the warfarin group (p<0.001)
Secondary outcomes: Major bleeding: 1.4% per year in the apixaban group, 1.2% per year in the ASA group (p = 0.57).
All-cause mortality: 3.5% per year in the apixaban group, 4.4% per year in the ASA group (p = 0.07).
Major bleeding: 2.13% per year in the apixaban group, 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (p < 0.001).
All-cause mortality: 3.52% per year in the apixaban group, 3.94% per year in the warfarin group (p = 0.047)

AFib, atrial fibrillation; ASA, aspirin at randomization; VKA, vitamin K antagonist; RCT, randomized-controlled trial.