Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;120(6):485–499. doi: 10.1038/s41437-017-0042-1

Table 1.

Results obtained with the best model selected from the various statistical models run for the response variables “proportion of analyses yielding homogeneous misleading clusterings” and “proportion of analyses yielding heterogeneous misleading clusterings”

Response variable Number of loci Factors of selected model Estimate Std error z-value (df = 7499) P
Proportion of analyses yielding homogeneous misleading clusterings
10 N −0.004 0.0005 −7.931 <0.0001
log10(N/NF) 0.399 0.084 4.746 <0.0001
N x log10(N/NF) 0.001 0.0002 5.185 <0.0001
20 N −0.005 0.0005 −9.658 <0.0001
100 N −0.0003 0.00006 −5.757 <0.0001
log10(N/NF) −0.194 0.259 −0.749 0.4540
N × log10(N/NF) −0.028 0.005 −5.190 <0.0001
Proportion of analyses yielding heterogeneous misleading clusterings
10 N −0.0002 0.00007 −3.496 0.0005
log10(N/NF) 1.107 0.114 9.672 <0.0001
N × log10(N/NF) 0.00004 0.00002 1.827 0.0677
20 N −0.0004 0.00006 −5.977 <0.0001
log10(N/NF) 0.574 0.079 7.178 <0.0001
N × log10(N/NF) 0.00009 0.00002 4.854 <0.0001
100 N −0.0009 0.0001 −9.666 <0.0001
log10(N/NF) −0.801 0.068 −11.715 <0.0001
N × log10(N/NF) 0.0003 0.00003 11.245 <0.0001

Note: Significant P-values, for a 5% threshold of significance, are shown in bold