Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;9:872. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00872

Table 1.

The relative abundance profile of different genomes in control and patient groups for the simulated dataset.

Genomes NCBI Accession ID Relative_Abundance_H Relative_Abundance_P
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 7330 NZ_CP012937.1 18%
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 NC_004663.1 0 6%
Bacteroides uniformis CL03T12C37 NZ_JH724268.1 7%
Alistipes putredinis isolate CAG MNQH01000001.1 16%
Parabacteroides merdae 2789STDY5834848 CZAG01000002.1 10%
Dorea longicatena 2789STDY5834914 NZ_CZAY01000001.1 10%
Ruminococcus bromii L2-63 FP929051.1 10%
Bacteroides caccae ATCC 43185 NZ_CP022412.2 9% 3%
Clostridium sp. SS2/1 NZ_DS547029.1 8%
Eubacterium hallii isolate EH1 NZ_LT907978.1 6%
Ruminococcus torques L2-14 FP929055.1 6%

The relative abundances were the proportions of the number of copies of 11 genomes within the community. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 is present only in the patient group, and it is another strain of B. thetaiotaomicron. Bacteroides caccae ATCC 43185 has threefold abundance in the control group of that in the patient group. H, healthy control; P, patient.