Table 1.
Named in this paper | Location in Chubak et al. | Description | Uses SEER variables |
---|---|---|---|
Second breast cancer event | In main paper | ||
Algorithm 1† | Figure 1 | High sensitivity | Yes |
Algorithm 2† | Figure 2 | High specificity, PPV | Yes |
Algorithm 3† | Figure 3 | Extremely high sensitivity | Yes |
Algorithm 4 | Figure 4 | High sensitivity | No |
Algorithm 5 | Figure 5 | High specificity, PPV | No |
Algorithm 6 | Figure 6 | Extremely high sensitivity | No |
Recurrence-specific | In supplementary analysis | ||
Algorithm 7† | Supplementary Figure 2 | High sensitivity | Yes |
Algorithm 8† | Supplementary Figure 3 | High specificity | Yes |
Algorithm 9† | Supplementary Figure 4 | High specificity and PPV | Yes |
Algorithm 10† | Supplementary Figure 5 | Extremely high sensitivity | Yes |
Algorithm 11 | Supplementary Figure 6 | High specificity and PPV | No |
Algorithm 12 | Supplementary Figure 7 | Extremely high sensitivity | No |
* Chubak et al. (5) outlined several approaches to defining second breast cancer events and recurrences using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data and utilization codes. HMO = health maintenance organization; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.
† In this paper, we focused on algorithms making use of SEER data, ie, Algorithms 1, 2, 3 and 7, 8, 9, and 10.