Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;18:144. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1782-5

Table 2.

Selected lifestyle characteristics of two sub-study subjects

Exposure variables LBW group (n = 315) Macrosomia group (n = 381)
LBW (%) NBW (%) P a Macrosomia (%) NBW (%) P a
N 105 210 127 254
Nearby chemical factory 0.303 0.934
 Yes 4 (3.8) 14 (6.7) 4 (3.2) 10 (3.9)
Recent interior decoration 0.279 0.374
 Yes 13 (12.5) 36 (17.2) 18 (14.2) 28 (11.0)
Regularly cooking 0.806 0.094
 Yes 76 (72.4) 154 (73.3) 97 (76.4) 173 (68.1)
Chief fuel used for cooking 0.989 0.920
 Pollution-type 11 (10.6) 22 (10.5) 15 (11.8) 29 (11.5)
 Ecological and clean-type 93 (89.4) 187 (89.5) 112 (88.2) 224 (88.5)
Use of range hood 0.285 0.876
 Yes 72 (68.6) 156 (74.3) 88 (69.3) 174 (68.5)
Pets 0.584 0.731
 Yes 29 (27.6) 52 (24.8) 28 (22.0) 60 (23.6)
Radiation-proof clothes use during pregnancy 0.978 1.000
 Yes 11 (10.6) 22 (10.5) 15(11.8) 30 (11.8)
Lipstick use during pregnancy 0.717 0.054
 Yes 6 (5.7) 10 (4.8) 2 (1.6) 15 (5.9)
Hair dye use pre-pregnancy 0.047 0.175
 Yes 75 (71.4) 126 (60.0) 75 (59.1) 168 (66.1)

Abbreviations: LBW low birth weight, NBW new birth weight

aT-tests and Chi-square tests were used to test differences in two sub-study subjects