Table 2.
RWJF/SCCM* Quality Measure | Description of Measure in QDACT | Metric adherence / eligible (%) (N=254) | Responses | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Assessment of patient decisional capacity | Asked to choose whether patient has capacity: yes/no | 22/254 (8.7%) | Patient has Capacity | 8/22 (36.3%) |
Patient Lacks Capacity | 14/22 (63.6%) | |||
2. Identification of surrogate decision-maker | If lack of capacity documented, clinician is asked to indicate if a proxy is documented | 14 /14^ (100%) | ||
3. Presence and contents of advanced directive | Clinician is asked to document the presence of an advanced directive | 91/254 (35.8%) | Advanced directives present | 54/91 (59.3%) |
Advanced directives absent | 37/91 (40.7%) | |||
10. Offer of psychosocial or emotional support | Clinician is asked to document a patient’s emotional wellbeing | 115/254 (45.3%) | Adequate emotional wellbeing | 41/115 (35.7%) |
Poor emotional wellbeing | 74/115 (64.3%) | |||
11. Pain assessment | Number of patients with documentation of pain assessment | 132/254 (52.0%) | Pain present (any severity) | 94/132 (71%) |
Pain not present | 38/132 (28.8%) | |||
12. Pain management | Number of patients with moderate/severe pain who had an intervention recorded for pain management | 37/37^ (100%) | ||
13. Respiratory distress assessment | Number of patients with documentation of respiratory distress assessment | 129/254 (50.8%) | Respiratory distress present | 96/129 (74.4%) |
Respiratory distress not present | 33/129 (25.6%) | |||
14. Respiratory distress management | Number of patients with moderate/severe respiratory distress who had an intervention recorded for respiratory distress management | 46/47^ (97.9%) | ||
17. Offer of spiritual support | Clinicians are asked to assess 2 items: spiritual well being and “are you at peace?” This is measured if either is answered | 158/254 (62.2%) | Spiritual well-being present | 65/158 (41.1%) |
Poor spiritual well-being | 93/158 (58.8%) |
The proposed measure is paired with the description of the surrogate measure from QDACT and the performance on that measure. The right hand column presents patients’ outcomes on these items.
The measures apply to all patients except items 2, 12, and 14. In these, the denominators reflect the numbers eligible. For item 2, only patients who have lack of capacity documented require identification of surrogates. For items 12 and 14, only patients with moderate or greater symptoms require intervention.
RWJF-SCCM: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Society for Critical Care Medicine End of Life Peer Workgroup’s proposed measures of quality palliative care in the ICU. The numbers correspond to the initial numbers in that document.4