Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Sep 30;52(6):873–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.05.026

Table 2.

Performance of Consultative Palliative Care on Patient-Level Measures of Quality of ICU-Based Palliative Care

RWJF/SCCM* Quality Measure Description of Measure in QDACT Metric adherence / eligible (%) (N=254) Responses
1. Assessment of patient decisional capacity Asked to choose whether patient has capacity: yes/no 22/254 (8.7%) Patient has Capacity 8/22 (36.3%)
Patient Lacks Capacity 14/22 (63.6%)
2. Identification of surrogate decision-maker If lack of capacity documented, clinician is asked to indicate if a proxy is documented 14 /14^ (100%)
3. Presence and contents of advanced directive Clinician is asked to document the presence of an advanced directive 91/254 (35.8%) Advanced directives present 54/91 (59.3%)
Advanced directives absent 37/91 (40.7%)
10. Offer of psychosocial or emotional support Clinician is asked to document a patient’s emotional wellbeing 115/254 (45.3%) Adequate emotional wellbeing 41/115 (35.7%)
Poor emotional wellbeing 74/115 (64.3%)
11. Pain assessment Number of patients with documentation of pain assessment 132/254 (52.0%) Pain present (any severity) 94/132 (71%)
Pain not present 38/132 (28.8%)
12. Pain management Number of patients with moderate/severe pain who had an intervention recorded for pain management 37/37^ (100%)
13. Respiratory distress assessment Number of patients with documentation of respiratory distress assessment 129/254 (50.8%) Respiratory distress present 96/129 (74.4%)
Respiratory distress not present 33/129 (25.6%)
14. Respiratory distress management Number of patients with moderate/severe respiratory distress who had an intervention recorded for respiratory distress management 46/47^ (97.9%)
17. Offer of spiritual support Clinicians are asked to assess 2 items: spiritual well being and “are you at peace?” This is measured if either is answered 158/254 (62.2%) Spiritual well-being present 65/158 (41.1%)
Poor spiritual well-being 93/158 (58.8%)

The proposed measure is paired with the description of the surrogate measure from QDACT and the performance on that measure. The right hand column presents patients’ outcomes on these items.

^

The measures apply to all patients except items 2, 12, and 14. In these, the denominators reflect the numbers eligible. For item 2, only patients who have lack of capacity documented require identification of surrogates. For items 12 and 14, only patients with moderate or greater symptoms require intervention.

*

RWJF-SCCM: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Society for Critical Care Medicine End of Life Peer Workgroup’s proposed measures of quality palliative care in the ICU. The numbers correspond to the initial numbers in that document.4