Skip to main content
. 2018 May;147(5):632–661. doi: 10.1037/xge0000441

Table 1. The Mean Proportion of Correctly Recalled Exemplars (With Standard Errors in Parentheses) for the Three Levels of the Retrieval Practice Status Across Experiments 1 to 4.

Experiment Retrieval practice status Effect sizes (Cohen’s d)
Rp+ Nrp Rp− Rp RIF
Note. The right hand pair of values show the effect sizes (Cohen’s d) relating to the effect of retrieval practice (Rp; the differences between RP+ and Nrp) and retrieval induced forgetting (RIF; the differences between Nrp and Rp−) in each row condition. The bold values represent effect sizes of comparisons that were significantly different from Nrp.
Experiment 1
 RP group: First test .798 (.023) .597 (.024) .529 (.030) 1.284 .465
 RP group: 7-day test .658 (.037) .440 (.031) .404 (.032) .941 .183
Experiment 2 .798 (.021) .658 (.019) .513 (.026) .982 .887
Experiment 3A
 3 repetitions .779 (.023) .500 (.024) .448 (.028) 1.681 .354
 6 repetitions .865 (.022) .490 (.029) .408 (.031) 2.049 .500
Experiment 3B
 1 practiced exemplar .875 (.027) .501 (.024) .461 (.030) 1.938 .267
 3 practiced exemplars .785 (.022) .486 (.025) .423 (.036) 1.930 .337
 5 practiced exemplars .741 (.023) .533 (.022) .331 (.038) 1.625 .795
Experiment 3C
 6 exemplars .715 (.028) .385 (.029) .354 (.033) 1.574 .172
 12 exemplars .585 (.029) .311 (.018) .247 (.018) 1.590 .703
Experiment 4
 Maximize remembering .850 (.033) .644 (.020) .643 (.024) .912 .008
 Maximize forgetting .766 (.022) .681 (.022) .550 (.042) .787 .545