Table 9. Chlorophyll A, B and total chlorophyll content by treatment.
| Chlorophyll variables | n | A | B | C | D | E | F | HSD | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | se | Mean | se | Mean | se | Mean | se | Mean | se | Mean | se | A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
| A_Chlor | 108 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.61 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.57 | 0.05 | a | a | a | a | a | a |
| B_Chlor | 108 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.02 | a | a | a | a | a | a |
| Total_Chlor_1 | 108 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.02 | a | a | a | a | a | a |
| Total_Chlor_2 | 108 | 0.67 | 0.06 | 0.71 | 0.06 | 0.82 | 0.08 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 0.04 | 0.73 | 0.07 | a | a | a | a | a | a |
Notes:
ANOVA values are in A_Chlor p-value = 0.35; HSD = 0.18; B_Chlor p-value = 0.46; HSD = 0.08; Total_Chlor_1 p-value = 0.48; HSD = 0.09; Total_Chlor_2 p-value = 0.32; HSD = 0.26.
A, recommended Urtica dose; B, half the recommended dose; C, double the recommended dose; D, Urtica recommended dose in combination with Equisetum; E, conventional foliar manure; F, control; A_Chlor, A chlorophyll; B_Chlor, B chlorophyll; Total_Chlor_1, total chlorophyll 1; Total_Chlor_2, total chlorophyll 2; Unit is chlorophyll milligram per gram of fresh plant; N, number of repetitions; se, standard error; HSD, post hoc Tukey test honestly significant difference.