Table 4.
Phenotypic Results Examining Group by State Effects for Executive Function (EF). The Findings Reported in Dark Blue are Significant at the Multiple-Comparisons Corrected Threshold of p <0.0083, While Findings in Light Blue are No Longer Significant After Correction. Significant Follow-up Tests for the Individual States are Highlighted in Orange.
| p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| both groups | State 1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 | State1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 |
| intercept | 0.767 | 2.267 | −1.501 | 0.779 | 0.367 | 0.498 |
| psychosis | −7.421 | −10.825 | 3.404 | 0.108 | 0.008 | 0.397 |
| EF | 0.059 | 0.084 | −0.025 | 0.092 | 0.005 | 0.422 |
| psychosis × EF | −0.061 | −0.093 | 0.033 | 0.144 | 0.010 | 0.359 |
| motion | −2.289 | −3.739 | 1.449 | 0.686 | 0.462 | 0.768 |
|
| ||||||
| beta | p-value | |||||
|
| ||||||
| HP only | State 1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 | State 1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 |
|
| ||||||
| intercept | 6.742 | 10.228 | 3.486 | 0.127 | 0.008 | 0.373 |
| Executve Function | −0.060 | −0.092 | −0.032 | 0.110 | 0.005 | 0.338 |
| motion | 2.970 | −6.143 | −9.113 | 0.773 | 0.459 | 0.340 |
|
| ||||||
| beta | p-value | |||||
|
| ||||||
| HP only | State 1 | State 2 | State 3 | State 1 | State 2 | State 3 |
|
| ||||||
| intercept | 8.480 | −7.884 | 0.032 | 0.024 | ||
| Executve Function | −0.082 | 0.065 | 0.016 | 0.028 | ||
| motion | −3.295 | 7.129 | 0.700 | 0.370 | ||
| Transitions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| beta | p-value | |||||
|
| ||||||
| both groups | State 1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 | State1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 |
| intercept | 2.352 | 2.108 | 0.244 | 0.064 | 0.112 | 0.819 |
| psychosis | −5.428 | −7.837 | 2.409 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.183 |
| EF | 0.034 | 0.055 | −0.021 | 0.030 | 0.001 | 0.116 |
| psychosis × EF | −0.047 | −0.068 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.001 | 0.174 |
| motion | −1.114 | −0.392 | −0.722 | 0.673 | 0.887 | 0.753 |
|
| ||||||
| beta | p-value | |||||
|
| ||||||
| both groups | State 1 | State 2 | State 3 | State 1 | State 2 | State 3 |
|
| ||||||
| intercept | −2.361 | 1.172 | 0.334 | 0.577 | ||
| psychosis | 9.679 | −7.479 | 0.014 | 0.038 | ||
| EF | −0.076 | 0.058 | 0.010 | 0.035 | ||
| psychosis × EF | 0.082 | −0.066 | 0.020 | 0.039 | ||
| motion | 3.199 | −2.586 | 0.513 | 0.566 | ||
|
| ||||||
| beta | p-value | |||||
|
| ||||||
| HP only | State 1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 | State 1 vs State 2 | State 1 vs State 3 | State 2 vs State 3 |
|
| ||||||
| intercept | 3.795 | 6.845 | 3.050 | 0.047 | 0.001 | 0.067 |
| Executve Function | −0.037 | −0.061 | −0.023 | 0.022 | 0.001 | 0.100 |
| motion | −3.014 | −6.325 | −3.310 | 0.497 | 0.171 | 0.401 |
|
| ||||||
| beta | p-value | |||||
|
| ||||||
| HP only | State 1 | State 2 | State 3 | State 1 | State 2 | State 3 |
|
| ||||||
| intercept | 4.464 | −5.011 | 0.036 | 0.002 | ||
| Executve Function | −0.048 | 0.036 | 0.009 | 0.009 | ||
| motion | −4.491 | 4.339 | 0.357 | 0.252 | ||
| Distance to Centroid | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| both groups | F | df effect | df error | p-value | |
|
|
|||||
| psychosis | 2.344 | 1.000 | 226.000 | 0.127 | |
| EF | 1.525 | 1.000 | 226.000 | 0.218 | |
| psychosis × EF | 2.172 | 1.000 | 226.000 | 0.142 | |
| motion | 4.889 | 1.000 | 226.000 | 0.028 | |
| state | 0.756 | 1.483 | 332.223 | 0.434 | |
| state × psychosis | 6.381 | 1.485 | 332.223 | 0.012 | |
| state × EF | 5.077 | 1.485 | 332.223 | 0.013 | |
| state × psychosis × EF | 4.704 | 1.485 | 332.223 | 0.018 | |
|
| |||||
| HP only | F | df effect | df error | p-value | |
|
| |||||
| EF | 0.135 | 1.000 | 226.000 | 0.713 | |
| motion | 5.381 | 1.000 | 226.000 | 0.021 | |
| state | 0.421 | 1.485 | 335.707 | 0.596 | |
| state × EF | 0.875 | 1.485 | 335.707 | 0.390 | |