Table 2.

The effect of diagnostic group (DLD vs. ND) on recall performance at each time point and in each recall condition.

Time/condition	Estimate	SE	t	p	FDR	95% CI
Trial 1	−0.9664	0.3390	−2.85	.0052	0.0068	[−1.6377, −0.2950]
Trial 2	−1.9989	0.4333	−4.61	< .0001	< 0.0001	[−2.8570, −1.1407]
Trial 3	−1.7997	0.4004	−4.49	< .0001	0.0001	[−2.5927, −1.0068]
Trial 4	−2.0393	0.3999	−5.10	< .0001	< 0.0001	[−2.8312, −1.2474]
Trial 5	−1.2701	0.3987	−3.19	.0019	0.0025	[−2.0597, −0.4804]
S/uncued	−1.8006	0.4487	−4.01	.0001	0.0003	[−2.6891, −0.9120]
L/uncued	−1.7257	0.4696	−3.67	.0004	0.0007	[−2.6558, −0.7956]
S/cued	−1.7393	0.4314	−4.03	< .0001	0.0003	[−2.5936, −0.8849]
L/cued	−1.6667	0.4286	−3.89	.0002	0.0003	[−2.5155, −0.8179]

Note. The estimate indicates the difference in number of words recalled by the two groups at each time or condition. Degrees of freedom for each comparison = 117. DLD = developmental language disorder; ND = normal development; FDR = false discovery rate; S = short delay; L = long delay.