Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2891–2905. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0031

Table 4.

The effect of diagnostic group (developmental language disorder vs. normal development) on recall performance at each time point and in each encoding condition.

Encoding condition Time (Day.Trial) Estimate SE t p FDR 95% CI
Uncued 1.1 −0.0377 0.0387 −0.98 .3347 0.3885 [−0.1155, 0.0402]
Uncued 1.2 −0.0782 0.0463 −1.69 .0985 0.1408 [−0.1715, −0.0152]
Uncued 1.3 −0.1330 0.0533 −2.49 .0164 0.0283 [−0.2404, −0.0256]
Uncued 2.1 −0.0292 0.0525 −0.56 .5808 0.5990 [−0.1349, 0.0765]
Cued 1.1 −0.1110 0.0404 −2.75 .0086 0.0158 [−0.1922, −0.0297]
Cued 1.2 −0.1806 0.0383 −4.72 < .0001 0.0001 [−0.2577, −0.1035]
Cued 1.3 −0.2144 0.0483 −4.44 < .0001 0.0002 [−0.3116, −0.1172]
Cued 2.1 −0.0642 0.0571 −1.13 .2665 0.3261 [−0.1792, 0.0508]
No test 2.1 −0.1043 0.0485 −2.15 .0368 0.0609 [−0.2019, −0.0067]

Note. The estimate indicates the difference in the proportion of features recalled by the two groups. Degrees of freedom for each comparison = 45. FDR = false discovery rate.