Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Ethics. 2017 Oct 13;16(1):71–87. doi: 10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9

Table II.

Frequencies of Respondents’ Self-Report of Misbehaviors and Knowledge of Colleagues’ Misbehaviors Grouped Within Defined Misconduct Composites; (self-report=224*; knowledge of colleagues behaviors=278**)

Misconduct Composite and Associated Misbehaviors Self-Report n (% of Total) Knowledge of Colleagues n (% of Total)
One or more times One or more times
Circumventing Research Ethics Regulations
Conducting research involving human subjects without prior approval from a Research Ethics Committee 39 (18.0) 73 (26.3)
Not obtaining proper informed consent from participants 37 (17.1) 97 (34.9)
Use of confidential information about research subjects without their authorization 25 (11.5) 52 (18.7)
Ignoring aspects of animal-subjects research requirements such as care, feeding, etc. 13 (6.0)   37 (13.3)
Fabrication and Falsification
Making up research data (fabrication) 21 (9.7)   72 (25.9)
Changing research data without mentioning it. 21 (9.7)   65 (23.4)
Dropping “outliers” without mentioning it 41 (18.9) 90 (32.4)
Selecting only those data that support your hypothesis 48 (22.1) 104 (37.4)  
Plagiarism
Publishing results that belong to someone else 14 (6.5)   55 (19.8)
Using someone else’s words or ideas without giving proper credit 19 (8.8)   92 (33.1)
Submitting a manuscript to a journal that you already published in another Journal 8 (3.7) 32 (11.5)
Authorship Misconduct
Giving authorship to someone who has not made a substantive contribution 40 (18.4) 105 (37.8)  
Denying authorship credit to someone who has made a substantive contribution 11 (5.1)   55 (19.8)
Allowing your name to be put on papers to which you have made little contribution 18 (8.3)   N/A
Conflict of Interest
Aware of a conflict of but failed to disclose it 7 (3.2) 27 (9.7)  
Compromising the rigor of a study’s design or methodology in response to pressure from a commercial or not-for-profit funding source 8 (3.7) 28 (10.1)
Inappropriately altering or suppressing research results in response to pressure from a commercial or not-for-profit funding source 7 (3.2) 24 (8.6)  
Other Research Practices
Ignoring aspects of materials-handling research requirements such as biosafety, radioactive materials, etc. 33 (15.2) 63 (22.7)
Providing an inappropriately negative or positive letter of recommendation 11 (5.1)   46 (16.5)
Cutting corners because one was in a hurry to complete a project 35 (16.1) 78 (28.1)
*

respondents with research experience;

**

respondents with and without research experience