Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Ethics. 2017 Oct 13;16(1):71–87. doi: 10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9

Table VII.

Attitudes regarding certain issues in responsible in conduct in research; percentages of respondents who answered “strongly agree/agree” (n = 248)

Question Total n (%) Ethics Training n (%) Research Experience n (%) Academic Position n (%)
With Ethics Training (n=143) Without Ethics Training (n=105) With Research (n=204) Without Research (n=44) Other (n=47) Masters, PhD, Postdocs (n=84) Faculty (n=114)
I’m concerned about the amount of misconduct that occurs. 183
(73.8)
114
(79.7) *
69 (65.7) 150
(73.5)
33 (75.0) 31 (66.0) 67 (77.0) 85 (74.6)
Dishonesty and misrepresentation of data are common. 131
(52.8)
71
(49.7)
60 (57.1) 106
(52.0)
25 (56.8) 25 (53.2) 37 (42.5) 69
(60.5) *
Investigators should report instances of research misconduct. 216
(87.1)
123
(86.0)
93 (88.6) 180
(88.2)
36 (81.8) 36 (76.6) 75 (86.2) 105
(92.1) *
The pressures to publish to gain promotion is a major reason why investigators engage in research misconduct. 171 (69.0) 94
(65.7)
77 (73.3) 144
(70.6)
27 (61.4) 31 (66.0) 58 (66.7) 82 (71.9)
Investigators should declare conflicts of interest to the appropriate officials. 217
(87.5)
128
(89.5)
89 (84.8) 183
(89.7) *
34 (77.3) 37 (78.7) 76 (87.4) 104
(91.2)
I am aware of regulations that govern research involving humans, animals, or laboratory practices. 174
(70.2)
121
(84.6)+
53 (50.5) 146
(71.6)
28 (63.6) 33 (70.2) 62 (71.3) 79 (69.3)
*

p≤0.05,

**

p≤.01,

+

p≤.0001