Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 26;1(3):170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.08.013

Table 3.

Effect of different dietary protein sources and levels in antibiotic-free diets on growth performance and incidence of diarrhea of weaned piglets.1

Variable Control SPC19 FM19 SPC23 FM23 SEM P-value2
Diets Basal Source Level Source × level
Initial BW, kg 5.98 6.00 5.99 5.97 5.98 0.14 0.999 0.951 0.974 0.886 0.949
Final BW, kg 7.48a 6.57b 6.73ab 6.33b 6.28b 0.19 0.001 0.001 0.758 0.077 0.580
ADG, g 107a 39.71b 53.15ab 37.46b 25.60b 13 0.003 0.001 0.956 0.303 0.380
ADFI, g 197 169 174 178 155 13 0.293 0.073 0.491 0.734 0.294
G:F 0.56a 0.30ab 0.29ab 0.24ab 0.18b 0.07 0.011 0.001 0.659 0.249 0.752
Diarrhea incidence, % 24.6c 47.2ab 40.1b 53.6a 56.2a 1.99 0.001 0.001 0.272 0.001 0.021

SPC = soy protein concentrate; FM = fish meal.

a,b,cWithin a row, values without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05), comparisons are from orthogonal contrasts.

1

Control = control diet of 17% CP; SPC19 = 19% CP diets formulated with more soy protein concentrate; FM19 = 19% CP diets formulated with more fish meal; SPC23 = 23.7% CP diets formulated with more soy protein concentrate; FM23 = 23.7% CP diets formulated with more fish meal.

2

Diets, all five diets; Basal, control compared to supplemented diets; Source, additional soy or fish protein; Level, 19 and 23.7%. Values are least squares means for 6 replicate pens per treatment.