Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 2;1(3):128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.08.015

Table 2.

Summary of the mixed effects models for CH4 production (L/d) using CO2 (L/d) as a fixed effect with and without dietary variables, experiment and ”cow within experiment” as random effects.

Model AIC1 ΔAIC1 Fixed effects and significance2
CO2 Phys3 FP ADF NDF ME FP × CO2
C1 8,323 0 +*** +* +*** ns
C2 8,324 1 +*** +* +***
C3 8,341 18 +*** +* +*** +**
C4 8,343 20 +*** +* +*** ns
C5 8,345 22 +*** +* +***
C6 8,347 24 +*** +* +*** ns
C7 8,349 26 +*** +* +***
C8 8,371 48 +*** +* ns
C9 8,373 50 +*** +*

FP = forage proportion, ME = metabolisable energy, ADF = acid detergent fibre, NDF = neutral detergent fibre.

ns = P > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, Wald tests.

1

AIC = Akaike information criterion, with ΔAIC corresponding to the difference between the AIC of each model and the AIC of model C1.

2

The sign of the estimated coefficients is also given.

3

Phys = animal physiological state (dry and young animals vs. lactating cows).