Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 27;10(4):415. doi: 10.3390/nu10040415

Table 1.

Risk of bias analysis classified as low, moderate or high grouped according to patient cohort of specific disease state.

Study Study Participation and Sample Size Risk Factor Measure Outcome Measure Statistical Analyses and Reporting Confounding Overall Risk of Bias
Athero [21] High Low Low Moderate High High
[23] Low Low Low High High High
[24] Low Low Low low Low Low
[18] High Low Low High High High
[25] Low Low Low low Moderate Moderate
[22] Moderate Low Low High High High
CKD [26] High Low Low High High High
[27] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[28] Low Low Low High High High
[29] High Low Low High High High
[30] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[16] Low Low Low low Low Low
[15] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[31] High Low Low Low Low Low
[32] Low Low Low High High High
[33] High Low Low High High High
VKA [34] High Moderate Low Low Low Moderate
Diabetes [12] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[13] Low Low Low Low Low Low
Healthy [35] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[36] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[37] High Moderate Low Low Low Moderate
[38] Low Low Low Low Low Low
VK sup [39] Low Low Low High High High
[40] Low Low Low High High High
[41] Low Low Low High High High
[42] Low Low Low Low Low Low
[43] Low Low Low High High High

Athero = atherosclerosis; CKD = chronic kidney disease; VKA; vitamin K Antagonist; and VK supp = vitamin K supplementation. A study was considered to be low risk of bias when the risk of bias was rated low on at least three of the five domains and was rated low for study confounding.