Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;10(4):434. doi: 10.3390/nu10040434

Table 2.

Summary of the in vivo studies included in the present review.

Legume Source Reference Study Design Parameters Measured Key Findings
Soybean (Glycine max. L.) Zhang et al. [1]
  • Male Sprague Dawley rats (150–180 g)

  • Groups: (1) Basal control (normal diet); (2) HFD insulin-resistant (IR control; sterilized water as vehicle control); (3) HFD + low-dose ISO (50 mg/kg/day intragastric administration (i.g.)); (4) HFD + medium-dose ISO (150 mg/kg/day i.g.); (5) HFD + high-dose ISO (450 mg/kg/day i.g.)

  • 30-day study

  • Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR)

  • Fasting insulin (RIA kit)

  • Fasting plasma glucose (commercial reagent paper)

  • Fasting plasma adiponectin, leptin, resistin (rat ELISA kits)

  • Tissue weights (epididymal and peri-renal fat pads)

  • mRNA levels in peri-renal adipose tissue (quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR); 45 cycles)

  • ISO ↓ fat pad weights, no differences in body weights among groups

  • ISO ↓ fasting insulin and HOMA-IR vs. IR control

  • ISO (150 and 450 mg/kg/day) ↑ plasma and mRNA adiponectin and leptin levels, ↓ plasma resistin levels

  • ISO (450 mg/kg/day) ↓ mRNA resistin levels

  • Positive correlation between plasma resistin and HOMA-IR

  • Negative correlation between plasma adiponectin and HOMA-IR

Nizamutdinova et al. [38]
  • Male Sprague Dawley rats (220–250 g)

  • Streptozotocin (STZ; 50 mg/kg) injected intraperitoneally to induce diabetes

  • Anthocyanins extracted from black soybeans

  • Groups: (1) Control (no STZ); (2) Diabetes control (STZ); (3) Anthocyanin (50 mg/kg) pre-diabetes (ANT-PRE) + STZ; (4) STZ + Anthocyanin (50 mg/kg) post-diabetes (ANT-POST)

  • 30-day study

  • Protein levels (Western blotting)

  • Fasting serum insulin (ELISA kit)

  • Fasting blood glucose (glucometer)

  • Anthocyanins ↓ blood glucose levels of diabetic rats vs. diabetic control group

  • Anthocyanins ↑ fasting serum insulin of diabetic rats vs. diabetic control group

  • Anthocyanins ↑ GLUT4 levels in skeletal muscle vs. diabetic control group

Ali et al. [64]
  • Male lean and obese Spontaneously hypertensive rat/N-corpulent (SHR/N-cp) rats (7–8 weeks old)

  • Basal diet: American Institute of Nutrition 93G formula

  • Soy isoflavone (ISO) supplementation (0.1% w/w)

  • 20-week study

  • Tissue weights (peri-renal, ileal, subdiaphragmatic, epididymal fat pads)

  • Soy ISO ↓ body weight of obese rats

  • Soy ISO ↓ peri-renal, epididymal, and subdiaphragmatic fat pad weights in lean and obese rats

  • Soy ISO ↓ ileal fat pads in obese rats

Zanella et al. [70]
  • Male C57BL6/J mice (3-weeks old)

  • Basal diet: low-fat diet (LFD)

  • Study 1 groups: (1) LFD (soy-free); (2) LFD + Soybean supplementation (8.5% w/w)

  • Study 2 groups: (1) LFD + vehicle (sham control); (2) LFD + genistein (5 mg/kg/day by oral gavage)

  • Study 1: 147 days; Study 2: 15 days

  • Glucose tolerance test (glucometer)

  • Insulin resistance test (0.75 Units insulin injected intraperitoneally; tail vein blood samples)

  • Body composition (Echo magnetic resonance imaging)

  • Tissue weights (epididymal and peri-renal fat pads)

  • Soy treatment ↑ total fat mass and ↑ fat pad mass vs. soy-free control group

  • Genistein ↑ adipose tissue mass vs. sham control

  • No differences in lean mass or total body weight between groups in Study 1 or Study 2

  • No difference in glucose metabolism or insulin sensitivity between groups in Study 1 or Study 2

Kavanagh et al. [80]
  • Mature insulin-resistant female monkeys (cynomolgus macaques and African green monkeys)

  • Soy isoflavone (ISO) supplementation (155 mg/day)

  • 4-month study

  • Glucose tolerance test (femoral intravenous collection: 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 min)

  • Insulin resistance test (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp)

  • Fasting plasma glucose (colorimetric assay)

  • Fasting insulin (ELISA kit)

  • Fasting plasma adiponectin (ELISA kit)

  • ISO ↑ insulin area under the curve vs. control

  • No effect of ISO on glucose area under the curve

  • No effect of ISO on circulating adiponectin levels

Zhou et al. [86]
  • Huangjiang mini-piglets (weaned at 21 days of age)

  • Groups: (1) Basal diet + 0.5% w/w corn starch (control); (2) Basal diet + 0.5% w/w soybean galactooligosaccharides (SBOS)

  • 14-day study

  • Short-chain fatty acid analysis (intestinal luminal samples by gas chromatography)

  • Gut microbial composition (RT-quantitative PCR)

  • SBOS ↑ intestinal short-chain fatty acids and number of beneficial bacteria vs. control group

  • SBOS ↓ numbers of harmful bacteria vs. control group

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Dai et al. [41]
  • Male CD-1 (ICR) IGS mice (6-weeks old)

  • α-galactooligosaccharides (α-GOS) extracted from chickpeas added to drinking water

  • Groups: (1) Normal chow; (2) HFD; (3) HFD + low-dose α-GOS (0.083 g/kg/day); (4) HFD + medium-dose α-GOS (0.42 g/kg/day); (5) HFD + high-dose α-GOS (0.83 g/kg/day)

  • 6-week study

  • Blood glucose (glucometer)

  • Serum insulin (rat/mouse insulin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit)

  • Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR)

  • Short-chain fatty acid analysis (luminal samples by high-performance liquid chromatography)

  • Gut microbial composition (quantitative PCR of fresh fecal samples)

  • HFD ↓ short-chain fatty acids, total bacterial quantity, & altered microbial composition

  • α-GOS ↑ short-chain fatty acids vs. HFD and normal chow groups

  • α-GOS stimulated Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus growth vs. HFD

Yang et al. [66]
  • Male Sprague Dawley rats (8 weeks old)

  • Diets: (1) standard chow; (2) high-fat diet (HFD); (3) HFD + chickpeas (10% raw, crushed chickpea seeds)

  • 8-month study

  • Insulin tolerance test (insulin at 2 Units/kg, intraperitoneal)

  • Oral glucose tolerance test (fasting glucometer readings from tail vein)

  • Fasting serum leptin (rat leptin radioimmunoassay (RIA) kit)

  • Fasting serum insulin (rat insulin ELISA kit)

  • Tissue weights (epididymal fat, skeletal muscle, liver)

  • Triglyceride content (Folch extraction method)

  • mRNA levels (Northern blot analysis of total RNA)

  • Chickpeas ↓ HOMA-IR, postprandial glucose, postprandial insulin levels vs. HFD

  • Chickpeas ↓ epididymal fat pad weight vs. HFD

  • Chickpeas ↓ hepatic and muscle triglycerides vs. HFD

  • Chickpeas ↓ leptin mRNA levels vs. HFD in epididymal adipose

N/A Choi et al. [65]
  • Female Sprague Dawley rats (5 weeks old)

  • Ovariectomy (OVX) or sham operation

  • Groups: (1) Sham + HFD; (2) OVX + HFD; (3) OVX + HFD + genistein (0.1% w/w ; 90% pure)

  • 4-week study

  • Fasting serum glucose (enzyme assay kit)

  • Fasting serum insulin, adiponectin, leptin (ELISA kits)

  • Insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR)

  • Tissue weights (liver and adipose)

  • Adipocyte histology (hematoxylin & eosin stain)

  • Gene expression (microarray analysis)

  • Genistein ↓ HOMA-IR vs. OVX group fed HFD

  • Genistein ↓ triglyceride accumulation and gonadal fat pad ewight

  • Genistein ↓ hepatic fatty acid synthase activity

  • Genistein ↓ fat synthesis genes

  • Genistein ↑ fat degradation genes

  • No differences in serum adiponectin or leptin between groups

N/A Weitkunat et al. [84]
  • Male C57BL/6J mice (8 weeks old)

  • Diets: (1) LFD; (2) HFD with 10% dietary fibre (HFD control); (3) HFD with 5% SCFA and 5% dietary fibre

  • 30-week study

  • Oral glucose tolerance test (fasting glucometer readings from tail vein)

  • Insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR)

  • Adipocyte histology (hematoxylin & eosin stain)

  • mRNA levels (RT-PCR)

  • Enzyme activity (developed assays)

  • SCFA ↓ HOMA-IR vs. HFD control group

  • Negative correlation between propionate and HOMA-IR

  • SCFA ↓ total adipocyte numbers and promoted small adipocytes vs. HFD control group

  • SCFA ↑ cytochrome c oxidase activity vs. HFD control group

  • SCFA ↑ mRNA levels of adipocyte browning markers

N/A Stahel et al. [91]
  • Male Sprague Dawley rats (225–250 g)

  • Groups: (1) Basal diet + 15% methylcellulose (Control); (2) Basal diet + 15% w/w GOS

  • 9-week study

  • Insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp)

  • Gut microbial populations (DNA isolated from fecal samples)

  • GOS ↑ Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroidetes, Lactobacillus spp. vs. control group

  • No differences in insulin sensitivity between GOS and control

Abbreviations: ↓, decrease; ↑, increase; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; α-GOS, α-galactooligosaccharides; HFD, high-fat diet; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance; i.g., intragastric administration; IR, insulin resistant; ISO, soy isoflavones; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid; RIA, radioimmunoassay; RT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; SHR/N-cp, Spontaneously hypertensive rat/N-corpulent.