Skip to main content
. 2018 May 10;15:77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0519-2

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis

First author Year Country NAFLD criteria PCOS criteria PCOS (NAFLD)a Control (NAFLD)# NOSb
Cerda C 2007 Chile Ultrasound Rotterdam 41 (17) 31 (6) 5
Markou A 2010 Greece Ultrasound Rotterdam 17 (0) 17 (0) 6
Gutierrez-Grobe Y 2010 Mexico Ultrasound Not mentioned 50 (31) 147 (62) 4
Vassilatou E 2010 Greece Ultrasound AES 57 (21) 60 (12) 5
Hossain N 2011 USA Histology Rotterdam 25 (11) 25 (5) 5
Zueff LF 2012 Brazil Ultrasound Rotterdam 45 (33) 45 (21) 5
Karoli R 2013 India Ultrasound Rotterdam 54 (36) 55 (14) 5
Qu Z 2013 China Ultrasound Rotterdam 602 (198) 588 (109) 5
Kahal H 2014 UK Ultrasound Rotterdam 19 (7) 17 (0) 6
Bohdanowicz-Pawlak A 2014 Poland Ultrasound Rotterdam 184 (106) 125 (62) 5
Kuliczkowska Plaksej J 2014 Poland Ultrasound Rotterdam 173 (92) 125 (40) 5
Romanowski MD 2015 Brazil Ultrasound AES 101 (24) 30 (1) 5
Vassilatou E 2015 Greece Ultrasound Rotterdam 40 (31) 70 (40) 6
Macut D 2016 Greece Serbia NAFLD-LFS Rotterdam 600 (304) 125 (43) 5
Ayonrinde OT 2016 Australia Ultrasound NIH 32 (12) 167 (25) 5
Jie C 2017 China Ultrasound Rotterdam 400 (225) 100 (38) 5
Kim JJ 2017 Korea Ultrasound Rotterdam 275 (15) 892 (25) 6

AES: Androgen Excess Society criteria

NAFLD-LFS: NAFLD liver fat score

aPCOS (NAFLD) means the total number of PCOS and the number of NAFLD in PCOS group

#control (NAFLD) means the total number of control and the number of NAFLD in control group

bThe quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the score ranged between 0 and 9