Table 3.
Intent To Treat (ITT) | Effect of Treatment on the Treated (ETOT) Intervention clinic patients only |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention clinic patients N = 1196 |
Control clinic patients N = 384 |
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a | Patients with tool use N = 232 |
Patients without tool use N = 964 |
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a | |
Returned for ≥1 visit in study period, N (%) | 963 (80.5) | 324 (84.4) | 1.02 (0.77, 1.34) | 202 (87.1) | 761 (78.9) | 1.78 (1.42, 2.23) |
Intervention patients, with a return visit N = 963 |
Control clinic patients, with a return visit N = 324 |
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a | Patients with tool use, with a return visit N = 202 |
Patients without tool use, with a return visit N = 761 |
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a | |
Insured by Medicaid at any return visit, N (%) | 584 (60.6) | 271 (83.6) | 0.42 (0.29, 0.61) | 130 (64.4) | 454 (59.7) | 2.00 (0.93, 4.31) |
Uninsured at all return visits in study period, N (%) | 356 (37.0) | 51 (15.7) | 2.00 (1.37, 2.94) | 67 (33.2) | 289 (38.0) | 0.49 (0.27, 0.90) |
Data source: EHR visit data
BOLD = adjusted odds ratio significantly different from 1.0 (p < 0.05)
Period assessed for uninsured visit = 12/1/2013–11/30/2014, Period assessed for return visits = patient-specific uninsured visit date through 11/30/2015
aLogistic GEE model clustered by clinic; adjusted for sex, age, race/ethnicity, primary language, federal poverty level, Medicaid identification number assigned (Y/N), household member(s) on case (Y/N), length of time household established with clinic, new patient at uninsured visit (Y/N)