Skip to main content
. 2018 May 10;18:354. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3159-x

Table 3.

Follow-up visit and coverage status, patients with ≥1 uninsured visit within 6 months of intervention

Intent To Treat (ITT) Effect of Treatment on the Treated (ETOT)
Intervention clinic patients only
Intervention clinic patients
N = 1196
Control clinic patients
N = 384
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a Patients with tool use
N = 232
Patients without tool use
N = 964
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a
Returned for ≥1 visit in study period, N (%) 963 (80.5) 324 (84.4) 1.02 (0.77, 1.34) 202 (87.1) 761 (78.9) 1.78 (1.42, 2.23)
Intervention patients, with a return visit
N = 963
Control clinic patients, with a return visit
N = 324
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a Patients with tool use, with a return visit
N = 202
Patients without tool use, with a return visit
N = 761
Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a
Insured by Medicaid at any return visit, N (%) 584 (60.6) 271 (83.6) 0.42 (0.29, 0.61) 130 (64.4) 454 (59.7) 2.00 (0.93, 4.31)
Uninsured at all return visits in study period, N (%) 356 (37.0) 51 (15.7) 2.00 (1.37, 2.94) 67 (33.2) 289 (38.0) 0.49 (0.27, 0.90)

Data source: EHR visit data

BOLD = adjusted odds ratio significantly different from 1.0 (p < 0.05)

Period assessed for uninsured visit = 12/1/2013–11/30/2014, Period assessed for return visits = patient-specific uninsured visit date through 11/30/2015

aLogistic GEE model clustered by clinic; adjusted for sex, age, race/ethnicity, primary language, federal poverty level, Medicaid identification number assigned (Y/N), household member(s) on case (Y/N), length of time household established with clinic, new patient at uninsured visit (Y/N)