Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 1;261:241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.008

Table 8.

Effect of region, maize variety and input application on maize yields and yield response to rotation. Data in brackets represent standard deviations from the mean.

n M-Ma plot (t ha−1) S-Mb plot (t ha−1) Yield response (t ha−1)
Region
 Dowa 17 1.47 (0.59) 1.79 (1.12) 0.32 (0.92)
 Mchinji 19 2.30 (1.37) 3.59 (1.56) 1.29 (0.87)
 Salima 17 3.75 (1.75) 4.98 (2.29) 1.23 (1.09)
 SEDc 0.45*** 0.58*** 0.32**



Variety class
 Improvedd 27 2.98 (1.65) 4.01 (2.14) 1.23 (1.06)
 Local 18 2.23 (1.57) 2.88 (1.87) 0.69 (0.97)
 SED n.s. 0.80* n.s.



Input class
 No inputs 15 1.66 (0.93) 2.19 (1.24) 0.49 (0.96)
 With inputse 32 3.06 (1.72) 4.28 (2.10) 1.28 (1.00)
 SED 0.60** 0.55*** 0.32*
a

M-M = maize after maize.

b

S-M = maize after soybean.

c

SED = Standard error of difference between means. For variety and input class ‘Region’ was added as a random factor in the REML, n.s. = not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

d

Hybrid or open pollinated varieties.

e

NPS (23:21 + 4S), urea, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and/or manure.