Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;24(18):20881–20894. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.020881

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Five movies, each of 4000 images, with 1408 × 128 resolution are taken of fluorescent 200-nm beads of volume fraction φ = 10−3 (representative image shown in Fig. 3(a)). Each movie is divided into eleven 128 × 128 ROIs and for each we find the range of wave-vectors, q, where τm scales as q–2. We find that where the light-sheet is thinnest (our central ROI) the expected τmq–2 scaling holds for larger q-values though it departs from the scaling, on the low-q end, at greater values than in regions where the light-sheet is thicker. Error bars depict the standard deviation of where the τmq–2 scaling fails on the low and high ends across the five different movies.