Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;34(10):1719–1725. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx828

Table 1.

The comparison of methods on the HOMSTRAD dataset

Metrics M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 Ref.
Lcore 146.6 139.4 135.6 130.2 117.2 138.6 134.1
ccRMSD 1.3 1.29 1.26 1.26 1.21 1.22 1.24
ccTM-score 0.674 0.641 0.618 0.602 0.546 0.642 0.619
Lali 173.8 167.8 166 162.7 154.3 NA 164.4
RMSD 1.46 1.48 1.48 1.49 1.50 NA 1.48
TM-score 0.784 0.758 0.746 0.735 0.7 NA 0.742
ACC 0.934 0.914 0.918 0.918 0.879 NA 1
RT 2.48 31.94 1.7 19.72 187.3 34.03 NA

Note: M1–M6 represents mTM-align, Matt, MAMMOTH-mult, MUSTANG, Promals3D and MultiProt, respectively. Ref. denotes the reference alignment given in the HOMSTRAD database. The best results are highlighted in bold type.