Skip to main content
letter
. 2018 Mar 14;21(5):665–673. doi: 10.1111/ele.12933

Table 2.

Linear mixed effect models predicting relative individual niche index (RINI; square‐root transformed) and social group isotopic niche size (ell95c) in banded mongooses

Response Effect Estimate SE χ2 P Conditional r 2
Individual‐level RINI (sqrt) Intercept 0.94 0.10 0.33
Age 0.017 0.014 1.59 0.22
Sex (male) 0.042 0.046 0.89 0.35
Group size −0.010 0.003 9.51 0.002
Proportion of group −0.40 0.10 12.64 0.0004
RINI (sqrt) Intercept 0.82 0.08 0.31
Age 0.015 0.014 1.13 0.29
Sex (male) 0.058 0.046 1.71 0.19
Group size (large) −0.17 0.064 7.51 0.006
Proportion of group −0.37 0.11 10.80 0.001
Group‐level Group ell95c Intercept 2.78 2.64 0.11
Group size −0.011 0.046 0.059 0.82
Sampling time 0.0046 0.0047 0.95 0.36
Group ell95c Intercept 3.12 2.97 0.11
Group size (large) −0.046 0.86 0.0029 0.96
Sampling time 0.0038 0.0043 0.78 0.40

RINI was calculated as the proportion of the group's niche that the individual niche occupied (see Fig. 1). Social group niche size was calculated using small sample size corrected 95% prediction ellipses (ell95c; Fig. 2). The group size data were bimodal (Fig. 3b) and so models were fitted using a continuous and a categorical group size variable. Significant effects are shown in bold.