Table 2.
Response | Effect | Estimate | SE | χ2 | P | Conditional r 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual‐level | RINI (sqrt) | Intercept | 0.94 | 0.10 | 0.33 | ||
Age | 0.017 | 0.014 | 1.59 | 0.22 | |||
Sex (male) | 0.042 | 0.046 | 0.89 | 0.35 | |||
Group size | −0.010 | 0.003 | 9.51 | 0.002 | |||
Proportion of group | −0.40 | 0.10 | 12.64 | 0.0004 | |||
RINI (sqrt) | Intercept | 0.82 | 0.08 | 0.31 | |||
Age | 0.015 | 0.014 | 1.13 | 0.29 | |||
Sex (male) | 0.058 | 0.046 | 1.71 | 0.19 | |||
Group size (large) | −0.17 | 0.064 | 7.51 | 0.006 | |||
Proportion of group | −0.37 | 0.11 | 10.80 | 0.001 | |||
Group‐level | Group ell95c | Intercept | 2.78 | 2.64 | 0.11 | ||
Group size | −0.011 | 0.046 | 0.059 | 0.82 | |||
Sampling time | 0.0046 | 0.0047 | 0.95 | 0.36 | |||
Group ell95c | Intercept | 3.12 | 2.97 | 0.11 | |||
Group size (large) | −0.046 | 0.86 | 0.0029 | 0.96 | |||
Sampling time | 0.0038 | 0.0043 | 0.78 | 0.40 |
RINI was calculated as the proportion of the group's niche that the individual niche occupied (see Fig. 1). Social group niche size was calculated using small sample size corrected 95% prediction ellipses (ell95c; Fig. 2). The group size data were bimodal (Fig. 3b) and so models were fitted using a continuous and a categorical group size variable. Significant effects are shown in bold.