Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 6;74(Pt 5):620–624. doi: 10.1107/S2056989018004905

Table 1. Comparative Ir—CPCP and Ir—CCO bond lengths (Å) of different [Ir(CO)ClH(PCP)] complexes.

PCP ligand or backbone (charges are omitted) PCP central carbon atom Ir—CCO Ir—CPCP Reference
C6H3-1,3-[OPR 2]2 sp 2 2.045 (3) 1.949 (4) Goldberg et al. (2015)
C6H3-1,3-[OPR 2]2 sp 2 2.057 (3) 1.913 (4) Goldberg et al. (2015)
C6H3-1,3-[OPR 2]2 sp 2 2.071 (2) 1.921 (3) Goldberg et al. (2015)
C(NCH2PR 2)2C10H6 NHC 2.078 (4) 1.904 (5) Hill & McQueen (2012)
benzotropylium alkyl­idene 2.082 1.929 Leis et al. (2014)
tropylium alkyl­idene 2.093 (5) 1.916 (5) Winter et al. (2005)
C6H3-1,3-[P(CF3)2]2 sp 2 2.103 (2) 1.952 (3) Adams et al. (2011)
C3H3-1,2-[OPR 2]2 sp 3 2.126 (8) 1.880 (7) Ruhland & Herdtweck (2005)
CH(NCH2PR 2)2C10H6 sp 3 2.141 (5) 1.904 (6) Hill & McQueen (2012)
C(dppm)2 CDP 2.157 (5) 1.891 (6) this work
cyclo­hex­yl sp 3 2.159 (4) 1.909 (5) Jonasson et al. (2015)
trypticene sp 3 2.163 (2) 1.895 (2) Azerraf & Gelman (2009)
cyclo­hex­yl sp 3 2.165 (5) 1.906 (6) Mayer et al. (1993)
trypticene sp 3 2.193(3 1.898 (3) Azerraf & Gelman (2009)
CH(dppm)2 protonated CDP 2.207 (3) 1.874 (4) this work
cyclo­hepta­trien­yl sp 3 2.25 (2) 1.78 (1) Nemeh et al. (1998)