Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;13(5):e0197095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197095

Table 2. Pearson’s correlation relationships between microbial (bacterial and fungal) phyla (RA > 1%) and yield properties of continuous ramie.

Phyla Stem
Length
Stem
Diameter
Bark thickness Fiber
Yield
Dry weight
Firmicutes 0.479 0.470 0.387 0.556 0.519
Proteobacteria 0.240 0.154 0.407 0.223 0.208
Actinobacteria -0.723** -0.605 -0.789** -0.831** -0.747**
Gemmatimonadets 0.169 0.148 0.278 0.090 0.126
Actinobacteria -0.174 -0.113 -0.148 -0.306 -0.221
Chloroflexi -0.697* -0.708* -0.558 -0.735* -0.726*
Bacteroidetes 0.277 0.126 0.482 0.342 0.265
Ascomycota 0.174 0.341 0.006 0.009 0.147
Zygomycota -0.800** -0.751* -0.874** -0.765* -0.777*
Basidiomycota 0.199 0.150 0.335 0.145 0.160
Glomeromycota 0.496 0.434 0.621 0.456 0.463
Chytridiomycota -0.388 -0.539 -0.174 -0.284 -0.388

RA is relative abundance.

* and ** represent significance at P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.