Table 3.
Region | All-year | p-Valuea | Cool season | Warm season | p-Value | FDRb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nationwide | 0.23 (0.11, 0.34) | — | 0.43 (0.21, 0.65) | 0.20 (0.08, 0.31) | 0.13c | — |
Northwest | 0.02 (, 1.91) | — | (, 2.51) | 0.69 (, 2.64) | 0.13b | 0.19 |
North | 0.27 (0.03, 0.51) | 0.12 | 0.25 (, 0.68) | 0.39 (0.04, 0.75) | 0.79b | 0.79 |
South | 0.21 (0.07, 0.35) | 0.09 | 0.51 (0.26, 0.76) | 0.13 (, 0.33) | 0.03b | 0.08 |
Note: Analysis excludes the Qing-Tibet region because few cities had of data. Estimates were generated using over-dispersed generalized linear models and polynomial distributed lag model for cumulative exposures over the same day and 3 days prior, adjusted for calendar day [natural cubic spline with 7 degrees of freedom (df)], day of the week, temperature (cross-basis function for temperature lagged for 0–13 days from distributed lag nonlinear model), and humidity (lag 0, natural smooth function, 3 df) to estimate city-specific associations that were combined using hierarchical Bayesian models. —, no comparison or the reference for comparisons; FDR, false discovery rate.
p-Values comparing effect estimates for the North and South regions to the Northwest (referent) region in meta-regression models with region, season (warm vs. cool), and interaction terms.
FDR or p-values comparing effect estimates for the warm versus cool seasons from separate meta-regression models stratified by region, with season as the predictor.
p-Value comparing effect estimates for the warm versus cool seasons over all cities in meta-regression models with region (two indicator terms for North vs. Northwest and South vs. Northwest), season, and interaction terms.